PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSHD vs. LVHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSHD vs. LVHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (XSHD) and Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSHD achieves a 8.51% return, which is significantly higher than LVHD's 7.25% return.


XSHD

1D
1.42%
1M
-1.41%
YTD
8.51%
6M
8.94%
1Y
9.23%
3Y*
2.45%
5Y*
-4.99%
10Y*

LVHD

1D
0.50%
1M
-1.09%
YTD
7.25%
6M
7.40%
1Y
10.89%
3Y*
9.64%
5Y*
6.16%
10Y*
8.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSHD vs. LVHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XSHD
Invesco S&P SmallCap High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
8.51%-6.41%-5.25%3.00%-19.48%18.31%-13.55%17.91%-7.86%1.52%
LVHD
Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF
7.25%7.50%10.18%-0.95%-1.82%26.90%-1.28%22.91%-5.58%14.25%

Correlation

The correlation between XSHD and LVHD is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2016

0.71

The correlation between XSHD and LVHD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

XSHD vs. LVHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSHD
LVHD

Real Estate

45.1%
15.0%

Utilities

10.7%
25.5%

Industrials

10.4%
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

9.6%
18.5%

Energy

7.6%
6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

6.8%
6.8%

Basic Materials

5.4%

-

Healthcare

2.7%
4.6%

Financial Services

2.2%
8.6%

Communication Services

1.9%
3.8%

Technology

-

5.9%

Real Estate

XSHD
45.1%
LVHD
15.0%

Utilities

XSHD
10.7%
LVHD
25.5%

Industrials

XSHD
10.4%
LVHD
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

XSHD
9.6%
LVHD
18.5%

Energy

XSHD
7.6%
LVHD
6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

XSHD
6.8%
LVHD
6.8%

Basic Materials

XSHD
5.4%
LVHD

-

Healthcare

XSHD
2.7%
LVHD
4.6%

Financial Services

XSHD
2.2%
LVHD
8.6%

Communication Services

XSHD
1.9%
LVHD
3.8%

Technology

XSHD

-

LVHD
5.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSHD vs. LVHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSHD
XSHD Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
XSHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSHD Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
XSHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSHD Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

LVHD
LVHD Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
LVHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHD Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHD Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSHD vs. LVHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (XSHD) and Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSHDLVHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.20

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

1.77

-0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.38

4.49

-2.11

XSHD vs. LVHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSHD Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the LVHD Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSHD and LVHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSHDLVHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

1.15

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.27

0.48

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.03

0.57

-0.59

Drawdowns

XSHD vs. LVHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSHD drawdown since its inception was -49.53%, which is greater than LVHD's maximum drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSHD and LVHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSHDLVHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.53%

-37.32%

-12.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.51%

-6.17%

-4.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.77%

-14.29%

-6.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.84%

-16.75%

-20.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.43%

-4.37%

-20.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.37%

-4.05%

-12.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.89%

2.43%

+1.46%

Volatility

XSHD vs. LVHD - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P SmallCap High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (XSHD) has a higher volatility of 3.52% compared to Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD) at 2.89%. This indicates that XSHD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSHDLVHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.52%

2.89%

+0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.86%

6.61%

+3.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.80%

9.53%

+5.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.89%

12.87%

+6.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.24%

15.50%

+6.74%

XSHD vs. LVHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSHD has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than LVHD's 0.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

XSHD vs. LVHD - Dividend Comparison

XSHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.33%, more than LVHD's 3.39% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
LVHD
Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF
3.39%3.35%4.23%3.55%3.30%2.56%3.27%3.30%3.82%3.33%2.48%
XSHD
Invesco S&P SmallCap High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
5.33%6.45%7.25%7.62%6.77%3.86%5.55%4.88%5.49%4.11%0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSHD and LVHD have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XSHD has higher volatility (3.52%) compared to LVHD (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSHD dropped -49.53% vs LVHD's -37.32%.

On 5-year performance, LVHD leads with 6.16% vs -4.99% for XSHD. On fees, LVHD is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, LVHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, LVHD has performed better with a 6.16% return vs -4.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LVHD is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for XSHD.

XSHD has the higher dividend yield at 5.33%, compared with 3.39% for LVHD.

XSHD tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Low Volatility High Dividend Index, while LVHD tracks QS Low Volatility High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for XSHD and 0.27% for LVHD.

LVHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSHD and LVHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer