PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSHD vs. FNDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSHD vs. FNDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (XSHD) and Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSHD achieves a 8.35% return, which is significantly lower than FNDA's 14.40% return.


XSHD

1D
-0.07%
1M
-0.38%
YTD
8.35%
6M
9.38%
1Y
7.68%
3Y*
1.27%
5Y*
-5.48%
10Y*

FNDA

1D
0.64%
1M
-0.11%
YTD
14.40%
6M
14.29%
1Y
29.17%
3Y*
14.87%
5Y*
6.73%
10Y*
10.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSHD vs. FNDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XSHD
Invesco S&P SmallCap High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
8.35%-6.41%-5.25%3.00%-19.48%18.31%-13.55%17.91%-7.86%1.52%
FNDA
Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF
14.40%7.44%9.00%20.29%-14.83%31.12%8.44%24.34%-12.12%12.68%

Correlation

The correlation between XSHD and FNDA is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2016

0.86

The correlation between XSHD and FNDA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

XSHD vs. FNDA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSHD
FNDA

Real Estate

45.1%
9.9%

Utilities

10.7%
2.8%

Industrials

10.4%
18.9%

Consumer Defensive

9.6%
4.2%

Energy

7.6%
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

6.8%
12.2%

Basic Materials

5.4%
5.2%

Healthcare

2.7%
6.8%

Financial Services

2.2%
14.6%

Communication Services

1.9%
4.1%

Technology

-

14.9%

Real Estate

XSHD
45.1%
FNDA
9.9%

Utilities

XSHD
10.7%
FNDA
2.8%

Industrials

XSHD
10.4%
FNDA
18.9%

Consumer Defensive

XSHD
9.6%
FNDA
4.2%

Energy

XSHD
7.6%
FNDA
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

XSHD
6.8%
FNDA
12.2%

Basic Materials

XSHD
5.4%
FNDA
5.2%

Healthcare

XSHD
2.7%
FNDA
6.8%

Financial Services

XSHD
2.2%
FNDA
14.6%

Communication Services

XSHD
1.9%
FNDA
4.1%

Technology

XSHD

-

FNDA
14.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSHD vs. FNDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSHD
XSHD Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
XSHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSHD Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
XSHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSHD Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

FNDA
FNDA Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FNDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDA Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDA Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSHD vs. FNDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (XSHD) and Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSHDFNDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.29

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.73

3.13

-2.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.98

10.09

-8.12

XSHD vs. FNDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSHD Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is lower than the FNDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSHD and FNDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSHDFNDADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

1.70

-1.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.29

0.32

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.03

0.49

-0.52

Drawdowns

XSHD vs. FNDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSHD drawdown since its inception was -49.53%, which is greater than FNDA's maximum drawdown of -44.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSHD and FNDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSHDFNDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.53%

-44.64%

-4.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.51%

-9.36%

-1.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.77%

-25.92%

+5.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.48%

-25.92%

-10.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.54%

-1.42%

-23.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.37%

-6.69%

-9.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.89%

2.90%

+0.99%

Volatility

XSHD vs. FNDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (XSHD) is 3.44%, while Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) has a volatility of 4.61%. This indicates that XSHD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSHDFNDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.44%

4.61%

-1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.70%

11.98%

-2.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.77%

17.24%

-2.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.88%

20.91%

-2.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.23%

22.39%

-0.16%

XSHD vs. FNDA - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSHD has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDA's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

XSHD vs. FNDA - Dividend Comparison

XSHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.34%, more than FNDA's 1.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDA
Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF
1.09%1.22%1.53%1.37%1.38%1.15%1.31%1.38%1.64%1.30%1.18%1.33%
XSHD
Invesco S&P SmallCap High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
5.34%6.45%7.25%7.62%6.77%3.86%5.55%4.88%5.49%4.11%0.41%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSHD and FNDA have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNDA has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to XSHD (3.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSHD dropped -49.53% vs FNDA's -44.64%.

On 5-year performance, FNDA leads with 6.73% vs -5.48% for XSHD. On fees, FNDA is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, XSHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FNDA has performed better with a 6.73% return vs -5.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FNDA is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for XSHD.

XSHD has the higher dividend yield at 5.34%, compared with 1.09% for FNDA.

XSHD is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while FNDA is Small Cap Blend Equities. XSHD tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Low Volatility High Dividend Index, while FNDA tracks Russell RAFI Small Company US. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for XSHD and 0.25% for FNDA.

FNDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSHD and FNDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer