XSEP vs. ENFR
XSEP (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September) and ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XSEP is a Options Trading fund actively managed by FT Vest, while ENFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. XSEP is actively managed, while ENFR is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XSEP returned 9.55%/yr vs 28.26%/yr for ENFR. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XSEP charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ENFR.
Performance
XSEP vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSEP achieves a 4.53% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 23.07% return.
XSEP
- 1D
- -0.00%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 4.53%
- 6M
- 4.57%
- 1Y
- 10.58%
- 3Y*
- 9.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ENFR
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- -5.94%
- YTD
- 23.07%
- 6M
- 24.76%
- 1Y
- 24.84%
- 3Y*
- 28.26%
- 5Y*
- 19.69%
- 10Y*
- 11.81%
XSEP vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSEP FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September | 4.53% | 8.94% | 8.41% | 16.07% | 2.93% |
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 23.07% | 5.88% | 42.17% | 15.63% | -0.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSEP and ENFR is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2022 | 0.35 |
The correlation between XSEP and ENFR shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSEP vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank
XSEP
ENFR
XSEP vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September (XSEP) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XSEP | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.29 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.03 | 2.89 | +0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.13 | 7.40 | +8.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XSEP vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSEP drawdown since its inception was -9.21%, smaller than the maximum ENFR drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSEP and ENFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSEP | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.21% | -68.28% | +59.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.51% | -8.64% | +5.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.21% | -15.58% | +6.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -62.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.07% | -6.12% | +6.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.54% | -15.94% | +15.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.66% | 3.36% | -2.70% |
Volatility
XSEP vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September (XSEP) is 0.97%, while Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) has a volatility of 5.42%. This indicates that XSEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSEP | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.97% | 5.42% | -4.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.91% | 11.57% | -7.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.84% | 14.82% | -9.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.99% | 19.24% | -12.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.99% | 24.68% | -17.69% |
XSEP vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSEP has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSEP vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison
XSEP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ENFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.08%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.08% | 4.77% | 4.41% | 5.48% | 5.23% | 7.86% | 7.57% | 5.81% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% |
XSEP FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSEP and ENFR have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ENFR has higher volatility (5.42%) compared to XSEP (0.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSEP dropped -9.21% vs ENFR's -68.28%.
On 3-year performance, ENFR leads with 28.26% vs 9.55% for XSEP. On fees, ENFR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XSEP has been the lower-risk option at 0.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ENFR has performed better with a 28.26% return vs 9.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ENFR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XSEP.
ENFR has the higher dividend yield at 4.08%, compared with 0.00% for XSEP.
XSEP is categorized as Options Trading, while ENFR is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XSEP and 0.35% for ENFR.
XSEP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XSEP and ENFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer