PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSEP vs. DNOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XSEP vs. DNOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September (XSEP) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November (DNOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XSEP vs. DNOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XSEP
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September
-1.18%8.94%8.41%16.07%2.83%
DNOV
FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November
-1.91%13.93%10.71%18.52%-0.09%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSEP achieves a -1.18% return, which is significantly higher than DNOV's -1.91% return.


XSEP

1D
1.48%
1M
-1.72%
YTD
-1.18%
6M
0.70%
1Y
8.32%
3Y*
8.91%
5Y*
10Y*

DNOV

1D
1.46%
1M
-2.36%
YTD
-1.91%
6M
2.32%
1Y
14.29%
3Y*
11.81%
5Y*
6.99%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XSEP vs. DNOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XSEP and DNOV have an expense ratio of 0.85%.


Return for Risk

XSEP vs. DNOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSEP
XSEP Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
XSEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSEP Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
XSEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSEP Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

DNOV
DNOV Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
DNOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DNOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
DNOV Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
DNOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DNOV Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSEP vs. DNOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September (XSEP) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November (DNOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSEPDNOVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.89

1.58

-0.69

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.36

2.33

-0.96

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.38

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

2.38

-1.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.38

12.43

-5.05

XSEP vs. DNOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSEP Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the DNOV Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSEP and DNOV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSEPDNOVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

1.58

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.39

0.81

+0.58

Correlation

The correlation between XSEP and DNOV is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

XSEP vs. DNOV - Dividend Comparison

Neither XSEP nor DNOV has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

XSEP vs. DNOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSEP drawdown since its inception was -9.21%, smaller than the maximum DNOV drawdown of -15.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSEP and DNOV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XSEPDNOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.21%

-15.03%

+5.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.16%

-6.13%

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.08%

-2.78%

+0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.56%

-2.06%

+1.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

1.17%

0.00%

Volatility

XSEP vs. DNOV - Volatility Comparison

FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September (XSEP) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November (DNOV) have volatilities of 2.77% and 2.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XSEPDNOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.77%

2.68%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.27%

4.45%

-0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.39%

9.09%

+0.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.14%

7.59%

-0.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.14%

9.12%

-1.98%