PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSEP vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSEP vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September (XSEP) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSEP achieves a 5.50% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 24.03% return.


XSEP

1D
0.15%
1M
0.71%
6M
4.92%
YTD
5.50%
1Y
9.52%
3Y*
9.42%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.87%

SCHD

1D
0.18%
1M
3.33%
6M
14.09%
YTD
24.03%
1Y
31.54%
3Y*
14.19%
5Y*
9.54%
10Y*
12.76%
ALL TIME*
13.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$786.88M$715.86M$685.58M
$106.14K$129.38K$326.53K

XSEP vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XSEP
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September
5.50%8.94%8.41%16.07%2.93%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
24.03%4.34%11.66%4.54%9.84%

Correlation

The correlation between XSEP and SCHD is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2022

0.56

Over the past year, the correlation between XSEP and SCHD has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSEP vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XSEP
XSEP Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
XSEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSEP Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
XSEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSEP Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XSEP vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September (XSEP) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XSEPSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.51

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

6.74

-4.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.83

17.01

-3.18

XSEP vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSEP Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSEP and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XSEP vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSEP drawdown since its inception was -9.21%, smaller than the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSEP and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSEPSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.21%

-33.37%

+24.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.51%

-4.61%

+1.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.21%

-16.13%

+6.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.24%

+1.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.53%

-3.30%

+2.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.66%

1.82%

-1.16%

Volatility

XSEP vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September (XSEP) is 0.79%, while Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a volatility of 4.11%. This indicates that XSEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSEPSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.79%

4.11%

-3.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.80%

8.11%

-4.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.86%

11.13%

-6.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.91%

14.39%

-7.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.91%

16.72%

-9.81%

XSEP vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSEP has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

XSEP vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

XSEP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.13%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%
XSEP
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSEP and SCHD have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHD has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to XSEP (0.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSEP dropped -9.21% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 3-year performance, SCHD leads with 14.19% vs 9.42% for XSEP. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, XSEP has been the lower-risk option at 0.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 14.19% return vs 9.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XSEP.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 0.00% for XSEP.

XSEP is categorized as Options Trading, while SCHD is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XSEP and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSEP and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer