XRT vs. MSTZ

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

XRT (SPDR S&P Retail ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XRT is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the S&P Retail Select Industry, while MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX. XRT is passively managed, while MSTZ is actively managed. Over the past year, XRT returned 9.86% vs 282.56% for MSTZ. At a correlation of -0.32, they often move in opposite directions. XRT charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.

Performance

XRT vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRT achieves a 3.06% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -23.27% return.

XRT

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: -0.08%
• 6M: -2.21%
• YTD: 3.06%
• 1Y: 9.86%
• 3Y*: 11.62%
• 5Y*: -0.14%
• 10Y*: 8.79%

MSTZ

• 1D: 5.07%
• 1M: 46.38%
• 6M: -9.68%
• YTD: -23.27%
• 1Y: 282.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRT vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
XRT SPDR S&P Retail ETF	3.06%	8.07%	5.27%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	-23.27%	-38.95%	-94.43%

Correlation

The correlation between XRT and MSTZ is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024	-0.32

Return for Risk

XRT vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRT

XRT Risk / Return Rank: 19
XRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
XRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
XRT Omega Ratio Rank: 17
XRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
XRT Martin Ratio Rank: 19

MSTZ

MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 68
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 68
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRT vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XRT	MSTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.48	1.92	-1.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.86	2.45	-1.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.32	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.73	3.35	-2.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.64	6.53	-4.88

XRT vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XRT Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XRT and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XRT vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRT drawdown since its inception was -65.81%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRT and MSTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	XRT	MSTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.81%	-99.38%	+33.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.53%	-84.89%	+71.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.62%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.57%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.02%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.39%	-97.39%	+88.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.97%	-94.53%	+79.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.01%	43.51%	-37.50%

Volatility

XRT vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) is 6.51%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 56.56%. This indicates that XRT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XRT	MSTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.51%	56.56%	-50.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.38%	135.11%	-120.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.70%	148.53%	-127.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.90%	171.02%	-144.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.17%	171.02%	-143.85%

XRT vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRT has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

XRT vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

XRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XRT SPDR S&P Retail ETF	0.77%	0.77%	1.52%	1.40%	2.15%	1.55%	1.01%	1.57%	1.51%	1.52%	1.36%	1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XRT and MSTZ in my portfolio?

XRT and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XRT or MSTZ?

MSTZ has higher volatility (56.56%) compared to XRT (6.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XRT dropped -65.81% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

Which ETF is better, XRT or MSTZ?

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 282.56% vs 9.86% for XRT. On fees, XRT is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XRT has been the lower-risk option at 6.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XRT or MSTZ?

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 282.56% return vs 9.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XRT or MSTZ?

XRT is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XRT or MSTZ?

XRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

What is the main difference between XRT and MSTZ?

XRT is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XRT and 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.