PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XRT vs. IYC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XRT vs. IYC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) and iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRT achieves a 7.76% return, which is significantly higher than IYC's -0.23% return. Over the past 10 years, XRT has underperformed IYC with an annualized return of 9.00%, while IYC has yielded a comparatively higher 11.46% annualized return.


XRT

1D
1.87%
1M
3.86%
6M
4.50%
YTD
7.76%
1Y
18.43%
3Y*
12.43%
5Y*
1.12%
10Y*
9.00%
ALL TIME*
9.68%

IYC

1D
1.46%
1M
0.54%
6M
-1.73%
YTD
-0.23%
1Y
5.11%
3Y*
13.35%
5Y*
6.39%
10Y*
11.46%
ALL TIME*
8.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$10.99M$10.43M$12.08M
$433.01M$377.95M$454.29M

XRT vs. IYC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XRT
SPDR S&P Retail ETF
7.76%8.07%11.78%21.53%-31.64%42.60%41.91%14.12%-8.04%4.22%
IYC
iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF
-0.23%7.85%27.54%34.03%-31.78%19.65%24.58%27.36%1.76%19.87%

Correlation

The correlation between XRT and IYC is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006

0.82

The correlation between XRT and IYC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

XRT vs. IYC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XRT
IYC

Consumer Cyclical

75.2%
66.8%

Consumer Defensive

18.7%
11.5%

Technology

2.7%
7.0%

Communication Services

1.8%
10.6%

Healthcare

1.6%

-

Energy

1.3%
0.1%

Basic Materials

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

3.9%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

XRT
75.2%
IYC
66.8%

Consumer Defensive

XRT
18.7%
IYC
11.5%

Technology

XRT
2.7%
IYC
7.0%

Communication Services

XRT
1.8%
IYC
10.6%

Healthcare

XRT
1.6%
IYC

-

Energy

XRT
1.3%
IYC
0.1%

Basic Materials

XRT

-

IYC

-

Financial Services

XRT

-

IYC

-

Industrials

XRT

-

IYC
3.9%

Real Estate

XRT

-

IYC

-

Utilities

XRT

-

IYC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XRT vs. IYC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XRT
XRT Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
XRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRT Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
XRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRT Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

IYC
IYC Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
IYC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYC Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
IYC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYC Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XRT vs. IYC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) and iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XRTIYCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.07

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

0.43

+0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.09

1.10

+1.99

XRT vs. IYC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XRT Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is higher than the IYC Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XRT and IYC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XRT vs. IYC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRT drawdown since its inception was -65.81%, which is greater than IYC's maximum drawdown of -53.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRT and IYC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XRTIYCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.81%

-53.10%

-12.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.53%

-11.97%

-1.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.62%

-21.62%

-4.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.57%

-35.90%

-8.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.02%

-35.90%

-11.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.26%

-4.00%

-1.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.95%

-9.93%

-5.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.97%

4.65%

+1.32%

Volatility

XRT vs. IYC - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) has a higher volatility of 6.29% compared to iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) at 5.39%. This indicates that XRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IYC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XRTIYCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.29%

5.39%

+0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.03%

12.01%

+3.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.91%

15.25%

+5.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.91%

20.89%

+6.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.20%

19.96%

+7.24%

XRT vs. IYC - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRT has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IYC's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

XRT vs. IYC - Dividend Comparison

XRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, more than IYC's 0.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IYC
iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF
0.50%0.51%0.47%0.68%0.68%0.39%0.65%0.89%0.90%0.92%1.10%1.03%
XRT
SPDR S&P Retail ETF
0.74%0.77%1.52%1.40%2.15%1.55%1.01%1.57%1.51%1.52%1.36%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


XRT and IYC have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XRT has higher volatility (6.29%) compared to IYC (5.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XRT dropped -65.81% vs IYC's -53.10%.

On 10-year performance, IYC leads with 11.46% vs 9.00% for XRT. On fees, XRT is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IYC has been the lower-risk option at 5.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IYC has performed better with a 11.46% return vs 9.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XRT is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for IYC.

XRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.50% for IYC.

XRT tracks S&P Retail Select Industry Index, while IYC tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XRT and 0.38% for IYC.

XRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XRT and IYC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer