PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XRT vs. FXD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XRT vs. FXD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) and First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund (FXD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRT achieves a -1.99% return, which is significantly lower than FXD's -1.88% return. Over the past 10 years, XRT has outperformed FXD with an annualized return of 8.56%, while FXD has yielded a comparatively lower 7.89% annualized return.


XRT

1D
-0.39%
1M
-0.29%
YTD
-1.99%
6M
-2.00%
1Y
8.44%
3Y*
13.38%
5Y*
-0.84%
10Y*
8.56%

FXD

1D
-0.39%
1M
2.79%
YTD
-1.88%
6M
-1.26%
1Y
9.00%
3Y*
10.33%
5Y*
3.00%
10Y*
7.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRT vs. FXD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XRT
SPDR S&P Retail ETF
-1.99%8.07%11.78%21.53%-31.64%42.60%41.91%14.12%-8.04%4.22%
FXD
First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund
-1.88%6.70%10.57%23.39%-21.56%22.72%12.97%24.22%-11.60%19.77%

Correlation

The correlation between XRT and FXD is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2007

0.86

The correlation between XRT and FXD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

XRT vs. FXD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XRT
FXD

Consumer Cyclical

73.6%
69.7%

Consumer Defensive

20.9%
9.2%

Communication Services

1.4%
6.7%

Healthcare

1.4%

-

Technology

1.4%
2.5%

Energy

1.4%
0.8%

Basic Materials

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

9.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

XRT
73.6%
FXD
69.7%

Consumer Defensive

XRT
20.9%
FXD
9.2%

Communication Services

XRT
1.4%
FXD
6.7%

Healthcare

XRT
1.4%
FXD

-

Technology

XRT
1.4%
FXD
2.5%

Energy

XRT
1.4%
FXD
0.8%

Basic Materials

XRT

-

FXD

-

Financial Services

XRT

-

FXD

-

Industrials

XRT

-

FXD
9.2%

Real Estate

XRT

-

FXD

-

Utilities

XRT

-

FXD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XRT vs. FXD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRT
XRT Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
XRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRT Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
XRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRT Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

FXD
FXD Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
FXD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXD Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
FXD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXD Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRT vs. FXD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) and First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund (FXD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XRTFXDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.09

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.63

0.65

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.45

1.65

-0.20

XRT vs. FXD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XRT Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is comparable to the FXD Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XRT and FXD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XRTFXDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

0.47

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

0.13

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

0.33

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.31

+0.03

Drawdowns

XRT vs. FXD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRT drawdown since its inception was -65.81%, roughly equal to the maximum FXD drawdown of -65.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRT and FXD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XRTFXDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.81%

-65.27%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.53%

-13.94%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.62%

-26.02%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.57%

-33.74%

-10.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.02%

-49.54%

+2.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.82%

-7.12%

-6.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.00%

-10.97%

-4.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.85%

5.48%

+0.37%

Volatility

XRT vs. FXD - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) has a higher volatility of 6.50% compared to First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund (FXD) at 6.00%. This indicates that XRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XRTFXDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.50%

6.00%

+0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.63%

14.23%

-0.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.42%

19.21%

+1.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.90%

22.70%

+4.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.16%

23.67%

+3.49%

XRT vs. FXD - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRT has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FXD's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

XRT vs. FXD - Dividend Comparison

XRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, more than FXD's 0.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXD
First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund
0.78%0.80%0.89%0.70%1.00%0.62%0.42%0.92%1.08%0.93%1.05%0.90%
XRT
SPDR S&P Retail ETF
0.83%0.77%1.52%1.40%2.15%1.55%1.01%1.57%1.51%1.52%1.36%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


XRT and FXD have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XRT has higher volatility (6.50%) compared to FXD (6.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XRT dropped -65.81% vs FXD's -65.27%.

On 10-year performance, XRT leads with 8.56% vs 7.89% for FXD. On fees, XRT is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, FXD has been the lower-risk option at 6.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XRT has performed better with a 8.56% return vs 7.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XRT is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for FXD.

XRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.78% for FXD.

XRT tracks S&P Retail Select Industry, while FXD tracks StrataQuant Consumer Discretionary Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XRT and 0.63% for FXD.

FXD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.47 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XRT and FXD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer