PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXD vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXD vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund (FXD) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXD achieves a -1.49% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 11.69% return. Over the past 10 years, FXD has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 7.93%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.65% annualized return.


FXD

1D
-0.68%
1M
0.69%
YTD
-1.49%
6M
0.09%
1Y
10.66%
3Y*
10.47%
5Y*
3.18%
10Y*
7.93%

VOO

1D
0.14%
1M
5.39%
YTD
11.69%
6M
12.11%
1Y
29.68%
3Y*
22.73%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
15.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXD vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXD
First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund
-1.49%6.70%10.57%23.39%-21.56%22.72%12.97%24.22%-11.60%19.77%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
11.69%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between FXD and VOO is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.81

The correlation between FXD and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FXD vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FXD
VOO

Consumer Cyclical

69.7%
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

9.2%
4.9%

Industrials

9.2%
8.3%

Communication Services

6.7%
11.3%

Technology

2.5%
35.7%

Energy

0.8%
3.5%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Financial Services

-

11.6%

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FXD
69.7%
VOO
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

FXD
9.2%
VOO
4.9%

Industrials

FXD
9.2%
VOO
8.3%

Communication Services

FXD
6.7%
VOO
11.3%

Technology

FXD
2.5%
VOO
35.7%

Energy

FXD
0.8%
VOO
3.5%

Basic Materials

FXD

-

VOO
1.8%

Financial Services

FXD

-

VOO
11.6%

Healthcare

FXD

-

VOO
8.5%

Real Estate

FXD

-

VOO
1.9%

Utilities

FXD

-

VOO
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXD vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXD
FXD Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
FXD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXD Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
FXD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXD Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXD vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund (FXD) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FXDVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.56

2.53

-1.97

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.95

3.43

-2.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.46

-0.36

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.73

3.42

-2.69

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.85

15.95

-14.09

FXD vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXD Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXD and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FXDVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

2.53

-1.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

0.85

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

0.87

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.89

-0.58

Drawdowns

FXD vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXD drawdown since its inception was -65.27%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXD and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXDVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.27%

-33.99%

-31.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.94%

-8.90%

-5.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.02%

-18.69%

-7.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.74%

-24.52%

-9.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.54%

-33.99%

-15.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.76%

0.00%

-6.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.97%

-3.69%

-7.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.46%

1.91%

+3.55%

Volatility

FXD vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund (FXD) has a higher volatility of 6.52% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.74%. This indicates that FXD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXDVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.52%

2.74%

+3.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.22%

8.88%

+5.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.22%

11.78%

+7.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.70%

16.81%

+5.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.68%

18.01%

+5.67%

FXD vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXD has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXD vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

FXD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than VOO's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXD
First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund
0.78%0.80%0.89%0.70%1.00%0.62%0.42%0.92%1.08%0.93%1.05%0.90%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXD and VOO have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FXD has higher volatility (6.52%) compared to VOO (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXD dropped -65.27% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.65% vs 7.93% for FXD. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.65% return vs 7.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for FXD.

VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.78% for FXD.

FXD is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. FXD tracks StrataQuant Consumer Discretionary Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for FXD and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXD and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer