XRPR vs. WTIU
XRPR (REX-Osprey XRP ETF) and WTIU (MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - XRPR is a fund fund actively managed by REX, while WTIU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%). XRPR is actively managed, while WTIU is passively managed. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XRPR charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for WTIU.
Performance
XRPR vs. WTIU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRPR achieves a -39.79% return, which is significantly lower than WTIU's 77.62% return.
XRPR
- 1D
- -6.14%
- 1M
- -22.91%
- YTD
- -39.79%
- 6M
- -45.83%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WTIU
- 1D
- -5.44%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 77.62%
- 6M
- 54.36%
- 1Y
- 102.77%
- 3Y*
- 3.50%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XRPR vs. WTIU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XRPR REX-Osprey XRP ETF | -39.79% | -41.78% |
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN | 77.62% | -7.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRPR and WTIU is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2025 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRPR vs. WTIU — Risk / Return Rank
XRPR
WTIU
XRPR vs. WTIU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX-Osprey XRP ETF (XRPR) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XRPR | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.99 | -0.12 | -0.87 |
Drawdowns
XRPR vs. WTIU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRPR drawdown since its inception was -64.94%, smaller than the maximum WTIU drawdown of -75.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRPR and WTIU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRPR | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.94% | -75.73% | +10.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -39.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -75.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.94% | -37.04% | -27.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.01% | -39.18% | -1.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 16.05% | — |
Volatility
XRPR vs. WTIU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRPR | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 22.65% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 55.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 77.87% | 67.36% | +10.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 77.87% | 70.60% | +7.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 77.87% | 70.60% | +7.27% |
XRPR vs. WTIU - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRPR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than WTIU's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRPR vs. WTIU - Dividend Comparison
Neither XRPR nor WTIU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XRPR and WTIU have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XRPR is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XRPR is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for WTIU.
XRPR and WTIU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XRPR and 0.95% for WTIU.
Find the right allocation for XRPR and WTIU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer