PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WTIU vs. OILU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

WTIU vs. OILU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) and MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN (OILU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

WTIU vs. OILU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
WTIU
MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN
113.23%-17.13%-29.63%-28.42%
OILU
MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN
112.51%-16.50%-21.65%-29.40%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with WTIU having a 113.23% return and OILU slightly lower at 112.51%.


WTIU

1D
-11.84%
1M
17.12%
YTD
113.23%
6M
89.84%
1Y
46.84%
3Y*
2.42%
5Y*
10Y*

OILU

1D
-10.60%
1M
12.27%
YTD
112.51%
6M
100.08%
1Y
45.27%
3Y*
7.13%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


WTIU vs. OILU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both WTIU and OILU have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Return for Risk

WTIU vs. OILU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTIU
WTIU Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
WTIU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTIU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTIU Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
WTIU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTIU Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

OILU
OILU Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
OILU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OILU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
OILU Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
OILU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
OILU Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTIU vs. OILU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) and MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN (OILU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WTIUOILUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.58

0.59

-0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.22

1.19

+0.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.17

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

0.91

+0.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.71

1.54

+0.16

WTIU vs. OILU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTIU Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is comparable to the OILU Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTIU and OILU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WTIUOILUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

0.59

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.05

0.20

-0.25

Correlation

The correlation between WTIU and OILU is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

WTIU vs. OILU - Dividend Comparison

Neither WTIU nor OILU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

WTIU vs. OILU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTIU drawdown since its inception was -75.73%, smaller than the maximum OILU drawdown of -81.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTIU and OILU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


WTIUOILUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.73%

-81.00%

+5.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.11%

-52.04%

-1.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.42%

-42.85%

+18.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.49%

-50.72%

+11.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.53%

30.74%

-2.21%

Volatility

WTIU vs. OILU - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) has a higher volatility of 22.50% compared to MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN (OILU) at 19.90%. This indicates that WTIU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OILU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


WTIUOILUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.50%

19.90%

+2.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.56%

43.84%

+2.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

81.69%

77.03%

+4.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

69.54%

81.31%

-11.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.54%

81.31%

-11.77%