PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
WTIU vs. NRGU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between WTIU and NRGU is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.4

Performance

WTIU vs. NRGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%Feb 23Mar 02Mar 09Mar 16Mar 23Mar 30Apr 06Apr 13
-46.54%
-56.07%
WTIU
NRGU

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

WTIU:

130.66%

NRGU:

157.94%

Max Drawdown

WTIU:

-76.28%

NRGU:

-57.50%

Current Drawdown

WTIU:

-74.51%

NRGU:

-56.07%

Returns By Period


WTIU

YTD

-35.09%

1M

-32.88%

6M

-52.61%

1Y

-72.18%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

NRGU

YTD

N/A

1M

-46.90%

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


WTIU vs. NRGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both WTIU and NRGU have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


WTIU
MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN
Expense ratio chart for WTIU: current value is 0.95%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
WTIU: 0.95%
Expense ratio chart for NRGU: current value is 0.95%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
NRGU: 0.95%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

WTIU vs. NRGU — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTIU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WTIU is 55
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WTIU is 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WTIU is 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WTIU is 77
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WTIU is 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WTIU is 33
Martin Ratio Rank

NRGU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NRGU is 66
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NRGU is 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NRGU is 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NRGU is 77
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NRGU is 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NRGU is 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

WTIU vs. NRGU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for WTIU, currently valued at -0.55, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
WTIU: -0.55
The chart of Sortino ratio for WTIU, currently valued at -0.48, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
WTIU: -0.48
The chart of Omega ratio for WTIU, currently valued at 0.93, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
WTIU: 0.93
The chart of Calmar ratio for WTIU, currently valued at -0.95, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
WTIU: -0.95
The chart of Martin ratio for WTIU, currently valued at -1.73, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
WTIU: -1.73


Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

WTIU vs. NRGU - Dividend Comparison

Neither WTIU nor NRGU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

WTIU vs. NRGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTIU drawdown since its inception was -76.28%, which is greater than NRGU's maximum drawdown of -57.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTIU and NRGU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%Feb 23Mar 02Mar 09Mar 16Mar 23Mar 30Apr 06Apr 13
-50.78%
-56.07%
WTIU
NRGU

Volatility

WTIU vs. NRGU - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) have volatilities of 59.61% and 61.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%70.00%80.00%Mar 23Tue 25Thu 27Sat 29Mon 31Wed 02Fri 04Apr 06Tue 08Thu 10Sat 12Mon 14
59.61%
61.29%
WTIU
NRGU
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab