PortfoliosLab logo
WTIU vs. NRGU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between WTIU and NRGU is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

WTIU vs. NRGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

WTIU:

131.79%

NRGU:

138.62%

Max Drawdown

WTIU:

-76.28%

NRGU:

-57.50%

Current Drawdown

WTIU:

-68.45%

NRGU:

-44.48%

Returns By Period


WTIU

YTD

-19.65%

1M

28.33%

6M

-44.34%

1Y

-61.30%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

NRGU

YTD

N/A

1M

30.65%

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


WTIU vs. NRGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both WTIU and NRGU have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

WTIU vs. NRGU — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTIU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WTIU is 66
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WTIU is 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WTIU is 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WTIU is 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WTIU is 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WTIU is 11
Martin Ratio Rank

NRGU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NRGU is 66
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NRGU is 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NRGU is 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NRGU is 77
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NRGU is 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NRGU is 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

WTIU vs. NRGU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

WTIU vs. NRGU - Dividend Comparison

Neither WTIU nor NRGU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

WTIU vs. NRGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTIU drawdown since its inception was -76.28%, which is greater than NRGU's maximum drawdown of -57.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTIU and NRGU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

WTIU vs. NRGU - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...