XRPR vs. ILS
XRPR (REX-Osprey XRP ETF) and ILS (Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XRPR is a fund fund actively managed by REX, while ILS is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Brookmont. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. XRPR charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.58%/yr for ILS.
Performance
XRPR vs. ILS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRPR achieves a -39.79% return, which is significantly lower than ILS's 1.86% return.
XRPR
- 1D
- -6.14%
- 1M
- -22.91%
- YTD
- -39.79%
- 6M
- -45.83%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ILS
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- 1.86%
- 6M
- 2.30%
- 1Y
- 7.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XRPR vs. ILS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XRPR REX-Osprey XRP ETF | -39.79% | -41.78% |
ILS Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF | 1.86% | 2.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRPR and ILS is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2025 | -0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRPR vs. ILS — Risk / Return Rank
XRPR
ILS
XRPR vs. ILS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX-Osprey XRP ETF (XRPR) and Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XRPR | ILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.99 | 1.90 | -2.89 |
Drawdowns
XRPR vs. ILS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRPR drawdown since its inception was -64.94%, which is greater than ILS's maximum drawdown of -1.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRPR and ILS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRPR | ILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.94% | -1.56% | -63.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.94% | 0.00% | -64.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.01% | -0.25% | -40.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.17% | — |
Volatility
XRPR vs. ILS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRPR | ILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.88% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.69% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 77.87% | 2.77% | +75.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 77.87% | 3.37% | +74.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 77.87% | 3.37% | +74.50% |
XRPR vs. ILS - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRPR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than ILS's 1.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRPR vs. ILS - Dividend Comparison
XRPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ILS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.09%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ILS Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF | 8.09% | 6.06% |
XRPR REX-Osprey XRP ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XRPR and ILS have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XRPR is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XRPR is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.58% for ILS.
ILS has the higher dividend yield at 8.09%, compared with 0.00% for XRPR.
They also come from different issuers: REX and Brookmont. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XRPR and 1.58% for ILS.
Find the right allocation for XRPR and ILS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer