ILS vs. CBYYX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

ILS (Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF) and CBYYX (Victory Pioneer Cat Bond Fund Class Y) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ILS returned 7.62% vs 10.95% for CBYYX. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ILS charges 1.58%/yr vs 1.46%/yr for CBYYX.

Performance

ILS vs. CBYYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS) and Victory Pioneer Cat Bond Fund Class Y (CBYYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ILS achieves a 1.76% return, which is significantly lower than CBYYX's 2.27% return.

ILS

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 0.30%
• YTD: 1.76%
• 6M: 2.03%
• 1Y: 7.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CBYYX

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 0.63%
• YTD: 2.27%
• 6M: 2.65%
• 1Y: 10.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ILS vs. CBYYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ILS Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF	1.76%	5.60%
CBYYX Victory Pioneer Cat Bond Fund Class Y	2.27%	9.37%

Correlation

The correlation between ILS and CBYYX is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2025	0.04

Return for Risk

ILS vs. CBYYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ILS

ILS Risk / Return Rank: 92
ILS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
ILS Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
ILS Omega Ratio Rank: 92
ILS Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
ILS Martin Ratio Rank: 96

CBYYX

CBYYX Risk / Return Rank: 100
CBYYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
CBYYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
CBYYX Omega Ratio Rank: 100
CBYYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CBYYX Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ILS vs. CBYYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS) and Victory Pioneer Cat Bond Fund Class Y (CBYYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ILS	CBYYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.77	9.05	-6.29
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.53	30.28	-25.74
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	8.80	-7.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	10.74	120.57	-109.83
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	35.99	425.21	-389.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ILS vs. CBYYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ILS Sharpe Ratio is 2.77, which is lower than the CBYYX Sharpe Ratio of 9.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ILS and CBYYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ILS	CBYYX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.77	9.05	-6.29
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.89	1.46	+0.43

Drawdowns

ILS vs. CBYYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ILS drawdown since its inception was -1.56%, smaller than the maximum CBYYX drawdown of -8.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILS and CBYYX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ILS	CBYYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.56%	-8.72%	+7.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.55%	-0.09%	-0.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.26%	-1.31%	+1.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.17%	0.03%	+0.14%

Volatility

ILS vs. CBYYX - Volatility Comparison

Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS) has a higher volatility of 0.88% compared to Victory Pioneer Cat Bond Fund Class Y (CBYYX) at 0.20%. This indicates that ILS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBYYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ILS	CBYYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.88%	0.20%	+0.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.69%	0.61%	+1.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.19%	1.23%	+1.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.39%	8.22%	-4.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.39%	8.22%	-4.83%

ILS vs. CBYYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ILS has a 1.58% expense ratio, which is higher than CBYYX's 1.46% expense ratio.

Dividends

ILS vs. CBYYX - Dividend Comparison

ILS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.09%, less than CBYYX's 8.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CBYYX Victory Pioneer Cat Bond Fund Class Y	8.93%	9.14%	10.33%	9.41%
ILS Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF	8.09%	6.06%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ILS and CBYYX in my portfolio?

ILS and CBYYX have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ILS or CBYYX?

ILS has higher volatility (0.88%) compared to CBYYX (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILS dropped -1.56% vs CBYYX's -8.72%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CBYYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.05 vs 2.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.