ILS vs. DBMF

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS) and iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF).

ILS and DBMF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ILS is an actively managed fund by Brookmont. It was launched on Mar 31, 2025. DBMF is an actively managed fund by Litman Gregory Capital Partners LLC. It was launched on May 8, 2019.

Performance

ILS vs. DBMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS) and iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ILS vs. DBMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ILS Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF	1.04%	5.60%
DBMF iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	7.87%	16.84%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ILS achieves a 1.04% return, which is significantly lower than DBMF's 7.87% return.

ILS

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.04%
• 6M: 2.11%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DBMF

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: -3.82%
• YTD: 7.87%
• 6M: 15.44%
• 1Y: 26.29%
• 3Y*: 9.90%
• 5Y*: 8.63%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ILS vs. DBMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

ILS has a 1.58% expense ratio, which is higher than DBMF's 0.85% expense ratio.

ILS

Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF

DBMF

iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF

Return for Risk

ILS vs. DBMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBMF

DBMF Risk / Return Rank: 95
DBMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
DBMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
DBMF Omega Ratio Rank: 95
DBMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
DBMF Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ILS vs. DBMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS) and iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ILS	DBMF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.19	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.68	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.92	0.74	+1.18

Correlation

The correlation between ILS and DBMF is -0.06. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

ILS vs. DBMF - Dividend Comparison

ILS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.15%, more than DBMF's 5.30% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ILS Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF	8.15%	6.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DBMF iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	5.30%	5.91%	5.75%	2.91%	7.72%	10.38%	0.86%	9.35%

Drawdowns

ILS vs. DBMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ILS drawdown since its inception was -1.56%, smaller than the maximum DBMF drawdown of -20.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILS and DBMF.

Drawdown Indicators

	ILS	DBMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.56%	-20.39%	+18.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.10%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.39%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.82%	+3.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.28%	-6.70%	+6.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.40%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ILS	DBMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.24%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.10%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.53%	12.09%	-8.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.53%	12.66%	-9.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.53%	12.48%	-8.95%