XRPR vs. EZPZ
XRPR (REX-Osprey XRP ETF) and EZPZ (Franklin Crypto Index ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - XRPR tracks the XRP while EZPZ tracks the CF Institutional Digital Asset Index – US-Settlement Price. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. XRPR charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZPZ.
Performance
XRPR vs. EZPZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRPR achieves a -42.06% return, which is significantly lower than EZPZ's -30.76% return.
XRPR
- 1D
- -2.47%
- 1M
- -2.58%
- 6M
- -39.04%
- YTD
- -42.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
EZPZ
- 1D
- -2.61%
- 1M
- 2.14%
- 6M
- -27.14%
- YTD
- -30.76%
- 1Y
- -46.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -28.05%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $118.67K | $153.22K | $218.96K | |
| $159.08K | $159.59K | $242.33K |
XRPR vs. EZPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XRPR REX-Osprey XRP ETF | -42.06% | -41.98% |
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF | -30.76% | -27.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRPR and EZPZ is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRPR vs. EZPZ — Risk / Return Rank
XRPR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EZPZ
XRPR vs. EZPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX-Osprey XRP ETF (XRPR) and Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XRPR | EZPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.83 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.86 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.31 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XRPR vs. EZPZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRPR drawdown since its inception was -67.27%, which is greater than EZPZ's maximum drawdown of -56.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRPR and EZPZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRPR | EZPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.27% | -56.63% | -10.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -56.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.38% | -53.31% | -13.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.14% | -25.14% | -20.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 37.10% | — |
Volatility
XRPR vs. EZPZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRPR | EZPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.34% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 36.00% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 74.44% | 47.82% | +26.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.44% | 46.94% | +27.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 74.44% | 46.94% | +27.50% |
XRPR vs. EZPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRPR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than EZPZ's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRPR vs. EZPZ - Dividend Comparison
Neither XRPR nor EZPZ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, XRPR and EZPZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, EZPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EZPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for XRPR.
XRPR and EZPZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
XRPR tracks XRP, while EZPZ tracks CF Institutional Digital Asset Index – US-Settlement Price. They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XRPR and 0.19% for EZPZ.
Find the right allocation for XRPR and EZPZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer