PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XRPR vs. EZPZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XRPR vs. EZPZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX-Osprey XRP ETF (XRPR) and Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRPR achieves a -42.06% return, which is significantly lower than EZPZ's -30.76% return.


XRPR

1D
-2.47%
1M
-2.58%
6M
-39.04%
YTD
-42.06%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

EZPZ

1D
-2.61%
1M
2.14%
6M
-27.14%
YTD
-30.76%
1Y
-46.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-28.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$118.67K$153.22K$218.96K
$159.08K$159.59K$242.33K

XRPR vs. EZPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
XRPR
REX-Osprey XRP ETF
-42.06%-41.98%
EZPZ
Franklin Crypto Index ETF
-30.76%-27.33%

Correlation

The correlation between XRPR and EZPZ is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025

0.90

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XRPR vs. EZPZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XRPR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


EZPZ
EZPZ Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
EZPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
EZPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XRPR vs. EZPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX-Osprey XRP ETF (XRPR) and Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XRPREZPZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.31

XRPR vs. EZPZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XRPR vs. EZPZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRPR drawdown since its inception was -67.27%, which is greater than EZPZ's maximum drawdown of -56.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRPR and EZPZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XRPREZPZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.27%

-56.63%

-10.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-66.38%

-53.31%

-13.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.14%

-25.14%

-20.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.10%

Volatility

XRPR vs. EZPZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XRPREZPZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

74.44%

47.82%

+26.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

74.44%

46.94%

+27.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

74.44%

46.94%

+27.50%

XRPR vs. EZPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRPR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than EZPZ's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

XRPR vs. EZPZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither XRPR nor EZPZ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, XRPR and EZPZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, EZPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EZPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for XRPR.

XRPR and EZPZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

XRPR tracks XRP, while EZPZ tracks CF Institutional Digital Asset Index – US-Settlement Price. They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XRPR and 0.19% for EZPZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XRPR and EZPZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer