XRPR vs. EZET

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

XRPR (REX-Osprey XRP ETF) and EZET (Franklin Ethereum ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - XRPR tracks the XRP while EZET tracks the CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. XRPR charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZET.

Performance

XRPR vs. EZET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX-Osprey XRP ETF (XRPR) and Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRPR achieves a -42.06% return, which is significantly lower than EZET's -37.21% return.

XRPR

• 1D: -2.47%
• 1M: -2.58%
• 6M: -39.04%
• YTD: -42.06%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

EZET

• 1D: -2.98%
• 1M: 9.70%
• 6M: -30.34%
• YTD: -37.21%
• 1Y: -46.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -26.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF	$372.59K	$480.59K	$696.37K
XRPR REX-Osprey XRP ETF	$159.08K	$159.59K	$242.33K

XRPR vs. EZET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XRPR REX-Osprey XRP ETF	-42.06%	-41.98%
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF	-37.21%	-34.38%

Correlation

The correlation between XRPR and EZET is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025	0.87

Return for Risk

XRPR vs. EZET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XRPR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

EZET

EZET Risk / Return Rank: 3
EZET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
EZET Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
EZET Omega Ratio Rank: 4
EZET Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
EZET Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XRPR vs. EZET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX-Osprey XRP ETF (XRPR) and Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XRPR	EZET	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.75	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-0.98	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.89	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.74	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-1.11	—

Drawdowns

XRPR vs. EZET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRPR drawdown since its inception was -67.27%, roughly equal to the maximum EZET drawdown of -67.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRPR and EZET.

Drawdown Indicators

	XRPR	EZET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.27%	-67.89%	+0.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-67.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-66.38%	-61.51%	-4.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-45.14%	-35.20%	-9.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	45.36%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XRPR	EZET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	13.02%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	45.86%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	74.44%	67.21%	+7.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	74.44%	71.33%	+3.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	74.44%	71.33%	+3.11%

XRPR vs. EZET - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRPR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than EZET's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

XRPR vs. EZET - Dividend Comparison

Neither XRPR nor EZET has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XRPR and EZET in my portfolio?

XRPR and EZET have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XRPR or EZET?

On fees, EZET is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XRPR or EZET?

EZET is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for XRPR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XRPR or EZET?

XRPR and EZET have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between XRPR and EZET?

XRPR tracks XRP, while EZET tracks CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant. They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XRPR and 0.19% for EZET.