XRPM vs. HACK
XRPM (Amplify XRP 3% Monthly Option Income ETF) and HACK (Amplify Cybersecurity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XRPM is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify, while HACK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq ISE Cyber Security Select Index. XRPM is actively managed, while HACK is passively managed. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XRPM charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for HACK.
Performance
XRPM vs. HACK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRPM achieves a -42.52% return, which is significantly lower than HACK's 19.47% return.
XRPM
- 1D
- -3.65%
- 1M
- -19.48%
- YTD
- -42.52%
- 6M
- -43.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HACK
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 1.23%
- YTD
- 19.47%
- 6M
- 17.28%
- 1Y
- 13.78%
- 3Y*
- 25.18%
- 5Y*
- 9.42%
- 10Y*
- 15.65%
XRPM vs. HACK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XRPM Amplify XRP 3% Monthly Option Income ETF | -42.52% | -12.80% |
HACK Amplify Cybersecurity ETF | 19.47% | -3.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRPM and HACK is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRPM vs. HACK — Risk / Return Rank
XRPM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HACK
XRPM vs. HACK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify XRP 3% Monthly Option Income ETF (XRPM) and Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XRPM | HACK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.11 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.67 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.57 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XRPM vs. HACK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRPM drawdown since its inception was -51.05%, which is greater than HACK's maximum drawdown of -42.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRPM and HACK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRPM | HACK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.05% | -42.68% | -8.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -20.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.05% | -8.87% | -42.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.60% | -11.61% | -16.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.82% | — |
Volatility
XRPM vs. HACK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRPM | HACK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.61% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 21.93% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.91% | 25.98% | +39.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.91% | 24.30% | +41.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 65.91% | 23.25% | +42.66% |
XRPM vs. HACK - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRPM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than HACK's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRPM vs. HACK - Dividend Comparison
XRPM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.60%, more than HACK's 0.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HACK Amplify Cybersecurity ETF | 0.06% | 0.07% | 0.14% | 0.20% | 0.24% | 0.26% | 1.11% | 0.14% | 0.09% | 0.01% | 1.23% |
XRPM Amplify XRP 3% Monthly Option Income ETF | 28.60% | 3.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XRPM and HACK have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HACK is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HACK is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for XRPM.
XRPM has the higher dividend yield at 28.60%, compared with 0.06% for HACK.
XRPM is categorized as Derivative Income, while HACK is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XRPM and 0.60% for HACK.
Find the right allocation for XRPM and HACK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer