PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XRLV vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XRLV vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF (XRLV) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XRLV

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VOO

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.04%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.93%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRLV vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XRLV
Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF
6.34%4.11%14.11%0.06%-4.77%27.39%2.56%29.80%-3.28%23.51%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between XRLV and VOO is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2015

0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between XRLV and VOO has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XRLV vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XRLV
VOO

Utilities

21.5%
2.4%

Financial Services

16.3%
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

15.3%
4.9%

Real Estate

11.6%
1.9%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.5%

Industrials

7.2%
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%
10.2%

Technology

5.6%
35.7%

Basic Materials

3.1%
1.8%

Communication Services

2.8%
11.3%

Energy

1.1%
3.5%

Utilities

XRLV
21.5%
VOO
2.4%

Financial Services

XRLV
16.3%
VOO
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

XRLV
15.3%
VOO
4.9%

Real Estate

XRLV
11.6%
VOO
1.9%

Healthcare

XRLV
8.4%
VOO
8.5%

Industrials

XRLV
7.2%
VOO
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

XRLV
7.1%
VOO
10.2%

Technology

XRLV
5.6%
VOO
35.7%

Basic Materials

XRLV
3.1%
VOO
1.8%

Communication Services

XRLV
2.8%
VOO
11.3%

Energy

XRLV
1.1%
VOO
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XRLV vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRLV

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRLV vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF (XRLV) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XRLV vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XRLVVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

Drawdowns

XRLV vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XRLVVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

Volatility

XRLV vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XRLVVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.01%

XRLV vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XRLV vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

XRLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%
XRLV
Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF
1.53%2.15%1.94%2.57%1.96%1.26%1.65%1.66%1.76%1.39%1.71%1.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


XRLV and VOO have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XRLV.

XRLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 1.03% for VOO.

XRLV tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility Rate Response Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XRLV and 0.03% for VOO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XRLV and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer