PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XRLV vs. SPHQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XRLV vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF (XRLV) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XRLV

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPHQ

1D
0.28%
1M
7.17%
YTD
15.48%
6M
16.06%
1Y
23.22%
3Y*
22.41%
5Y*
14.54%
10Y*
15.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRLV vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XRLV
Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF
6.34%4.11%14.11%0.06%-4.77%27.39%2.56%29.80%-3.28%23.51%
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
15.48%13.25%25.44%24.83%-15.76%28.03%17.36%33.64%-7.10%19.10%

Correlation

The correlation between XRLV and SPHQ is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2015

0.76

Over the past year, the correlation between XRLV and SPHQ has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XRLV vs. SPHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XRLV
SPHQ

Utilities

21.5%
1.0%

Financial Services

16.3%
13.3%

Consumer Defensive

15.3%
15.4%

Real Estate

11.6%

-

Healthcare

8.4%
8.4%

Industrials

7.2%
24.3%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%
4.6%

Technology

5.6%
28.1%

Basic Materials

3.1%
2.2%

Communication Services

2.8%
2.0%

Energy

1.1%
0.7%

Utilities

XRLV
21.5%
SPHQ
1.0%

Financial Services

XRLV
16.3%
SPHQ
13.3%

Consumer Defensive

XRLV
15.3%
SPHQ
15.4%

Real Estate

XRLV
11.6%
SPHQ

-

Healthcare

XRLV
8.4%
SPHQ
8.4%

Industrials

XRLV
7.2%
SPHQ
24.3%

Consumer Cyclical

XRLV
7.1%
SPHQ
4.6%

Technology

XRLV
5.6%
SPHQ
28.1%

Basic Materials

XRLV
3.1%
SPHQ
2.2%

Communication Services

XRLV
2.8%
SPHQ
2.0%

Energy

XRLV
1.1%
SPHQ
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XRLV vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRLV

SPHQ
SPHQ Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SPHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRLV vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF (XRLV) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XRLV vs. SPHQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XRLVSPHQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

Drawdowns

XRLV vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XRLVSPHQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

Volatility

XRLV vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XRLVSPHQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.86%

XRLV vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XRLV vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison

XRLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, more than SPHQ's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
1.04%1.09%1.15%1.42%1.85%1.19%1.55%1.51%1.85%1.57%1.67%2.29%
XRLV
Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF
1.53%2.15%1.94%2.57%1.96%1.26%1.65%1.66%1.76%1.39%1.71%1.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


XRLV and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XRLV.

XRLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 1.04% for SPHQ.

XRLV tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility Rate Response Index, while SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XRLV and 0.15% for SPHQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XRLV and SPHQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer