XRLV vs. QQQM
XRLV (Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XRLV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Low Volatility Rate Response Index, while QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XRLV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.
Performance
XRLV vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XRLV
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQM
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 10.67%
- YTD
- 21.39%
- 6M
- 19.75%
- 1Y
- 41.98%
- 3Y*
- 28.89%
- 5Y*
- 18.07%
- 10Y*
- —
XRLV vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XRLV Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF | 6.34% | 4.11% | 14.11% | 0.06% | -4.77% | 27.39% | 4.47% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 21.39% | 20.85% | 25.68% | 55.01% | -32.52% | 27.45% | 6.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRLV and QQQM is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020 | 0.40 |
The correlation between XRLV and QQQM shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XRLV vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XRLV
QQQM
Utilities
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
XRLV
QQQM
Financial Services
XRLV
QQQM
Consumer Defensive
XRLV
QQQM
Real Estate
XRLV
QQQM
Healthcare
XRLV
QQQM
Industrials
XRLV
QQQM
Consumer Cyclical
XRLV
QQQM
Technology
XRLV
QQQM
Basic Materials
XRLV
QQQM
Communication Services
XRLV
QQQM
Energy
XRLV
QQQM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRLV vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank
XRLV
QQQM
XRLV vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF (XRLV) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XRLV | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.85 | — |
Drawdowns
XRLV vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRLV | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -35.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -0.20% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -8.25% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.11% | — |
Volatility
XRLV vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRLV | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.48% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.05% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 15.91% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 22.24% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 22.12% | — |
XRLV vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XRLV vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison
XRLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, more than QQQM's 0.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.41% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XRLV Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF | 1.53% | 2.15% | 1.94% | 2.57% | 1.96% | 1.26% | 1.65% | 1.66% | 1.76% | 1.39% | 1.71% | 1.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XRLV and QQQM have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XRLV.
XRLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 0.41% for QQQM.
XRLV is categorized as S&P 500, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. XRLV tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility Rate Response Index, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XRLV and 0.15% for QQQM.
Find the right allocation for XRLV and QQQM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer