PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XRLV vs. QQQM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XRLV vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF (XRLV) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XRLV

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQM

1D
-0.20%
1M
10.67%
YTD
21.39%
6M
19.75%
1Y
41.98%
3Y*
28.89%
5Y*
18.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRLV vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XRLV
Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF
6.34%4.11%14.11%0.06%-4.77%27.39%4.47%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
21.39%20.85%25.68%55.01%-32.52%27.45%6.67%

Correlation

The correlation between XRLV and QQQM is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020

0.40

The correlation between XRLV and QQQM shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XRLV vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XRLV
QQQM

Utilities

21.5%
1.4%

Financial Services

16.3%
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

15.3%
7.7%

Real Estate

11.6%
0.1%

Healthcare

8.4%
4.2%

Industrials

7.2%
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%
12.3%

Technology

5.6%
53.8%

Basic Materials

3.1%
1.1%

Communication Services

2.8%
15.8%

Energy

1.1%
0.6%

Utilities

XRLV
21.5%
QQQM
1.4%

Financial Services

XRLV
16.3%
QQQM
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

XRLV
15.3%
QQQM
7.7%

Real Estate

XRLV
11.6%
QQQM
0.1%

Healthcare

XRLV
8.4%
QQQM
4.2%

Industrials

XRLV
7.2%
QQQM
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

XRLV
7.1%
QQQM
12.3%

Technology

XRLV
5.6%
QQQM
53.8%

Basic Materials

XRLV
3.1%
QQQM
1.1%

Communication Services

XRLV
2.8%
QQQM
15.8%

Energy

XRLV
1.1%
QQQM
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XRLV vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRLV

QQQM
QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRLV vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF (XRLV) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XRLV vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XRLVQQQMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

Drawdowns

XRLV vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XRLVQQQMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

Volatility

XRLV vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XRLVQQQMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.12%

XRLV vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XRLV vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

XRLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, more than QQQM's 0.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.41%0.50%0.61%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XRLV
Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF
1.53%2.15%1.94%2.57%1.96%1.26%1.65%1.66%1.76%1.39%1.71%1.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


XRLV and QQQM have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XRLV.

XRLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 0.41% for QQQM.

XRLV is categorized as S&P 500, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. XRLV tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility Rate Response Index, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XRLV and 0.15% for QQQM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XRLV and QQQM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer