XRH0.L vs. SVR-C.TO
XRH0.L (Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC) and SVR-C.TO (iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged)) are both exchange-traded funds - XRH0.L is a Metals fund tracking the Rhodium, while SVR-C.TO is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XRH0.L returned 27.32%/yr vs 11.49%/yr for SVR-C.TO. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XRH0.L charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for SVR-C.TO.
Performance
XRH0.L vs. SVR-C.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XRH0.L is traded in USD, while SVR-C.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the SVR-C.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRH0.L achieves a -28.17% return, which is significantly lower than SVR-C.TO's -17.45% return. Over the past 10 years, XRH0.L has outperformed SVR-C.TO with an annualized return of 27.32%, while SVR-C.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.49% annualized return.
XRH0.L
- 1D
- 1.54%
- 1M
- -10.60%
- YTD
- -28.17%
- 6M
- -23.84%
- 1Y
- 40.60%
- 3Y*
- 18.05%
- 5Y*
- -15.19%
- 10Y*
- 27.32%
SVR-C.TO
- 1D
- 1.73%
- 1M
- -21.81%
- YTD
- -17.45%
- 6M
- -22.77%
- 1Y
- 63.83%
- 3Y*
- 36.65%
- 5Y*
- 17.03%
- 10Y*
- 11.49%
XRH0.L vs. SVR-C.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XRH0.L Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC | -28.17% | 205.23% | -14.69% | -60.81% | -4.46% | -15.51% | 183.21% | 132.83% | 46.39% | 100.00% |
SVR-C.TO iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) | -17.45% | 144.05% | 20.41% | -0.28% | 3.15% | -12.98% | 47.38% | 13.97% | -9.93% | 4.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRH0.L and SVR-C.TO is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2012 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRH0.L vs. SVR-C.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XRH0.L
SVR-C.TO
XRH0.L vs. SVR-C.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) and iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) (SVR-C.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XRH0.L | SVR-C.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.23 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | 1.26 | -0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.91 | 2.76 | -0.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XRH0.L vs. SVR-C.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRH0.L drawdown since its inception was -85.90%, which is greater than SVR-C.TO's maximum drawdown of -67.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRH0.L and SVR-C.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRH0.L | SVR-C.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.90% | -67.24% | -18.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.30% | -51.08% | +10.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.87% | -51.08% | +4.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.27% | -51.08% | -30.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.90% | -51.08% | -34.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -67.56% | -49.32% | -18.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.59% | -40.00% | -10.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.21% | 23.18% | -1.97% |
Volatility
XRH0.L vs. SVR-C.TO - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) has a higher volatility of 28.09% compared to iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) (SVR-C.TO) at 15.47%. This indicates that XRH0.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SVR-C.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRH0.L | SVR-C.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.09% | 15.47% | +12.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 70.45% | 56.85% | +13.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 89.78% | 59.24% | +30.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.02% | 36.71% | +32.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.84% | 32.53% | +34.31% |
XRH0.L vs. SVR-C.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRH0.L has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SVR-C.TO's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRH0.L vs. SVR-C.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither XRH0.L nor SVR-C.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XRH0.L and SVR-C.TO have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SVR-C.TO is cheaper at 0.66% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SVR-C.TO is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for XRH0.L.
XRH0.L is categorized as Metals, while SVR-C.TO is Silver. XRH0.L tracks Rhodium, while SVR-C.TO tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for XRH0.L and 0.66% for SVR-C.TO.
Find the right allocation for XRH0.L and SVR-C.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer