XRH0.L vs. SLVP
XRH0.L (Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC) and SLVP (iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XRH0.L is a Metals fund tracking the Rhodium, while SLVP is a Silver fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XRH0.L returned 27.32%/yr vs 9.87%/yr for SLVP. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XRH0.L charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for SLVP.
Performance
XRH0.L vs. SLVP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRH0.L achieves a -28.17% return, which is significantly lower than SLVP's -9.65% return. Over the past 10 years, XRH0.L has outperformed SLVP with an annualized return of 27.32%, while SLVP has yielded a comparatively lower 9.87% annualized return.
XRH0.L
- 1D
- 1.54%
- 1M
- -10.60%
- YTD
- -28.17%
- 6M
- -23.84%
- 1Y
- 40.60%
- 3Y*
- 18.05%
- 5Y*
- -15.19%
- 10Y*
- 27.32%
SLVP
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -16.43%
- YTD
- -9.65%
- 6M
- -11.21%
- 1Y
- 76.85%
- 3Y*
- 49.15%
- 5Y*
- 16.22%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
XRH0.L vs. SLVP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XRH0.L Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC | -28.17% | 205.23% | -14.69% | -60.81% | -4.46% | -15.51% | 183.21% | 132.83% | 46.39% | 100.00% |
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | -9.65% | 202.84% | 14.47% | -2.31% | -18.06% | -23.53% | 56.45% | 37.71% | -22.10% | 4.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRH0.L and SLVP is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2012 | 0.07 |
The correlation between XRH0.L and SLVP shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (10 years) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRH0.L vs. SLVP — Risk / Return Rank
XRH0.L
SLVP
XRH0.L vs. SLVP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) and iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XRH0.L | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.24 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | 2.03 | -1.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.91 | 4.88 | -2.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XRH0.L vs. SLVP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRH0.L drawdown since its inception was -85.90%, which is greater than SLVP's maximum drawdown of -80.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRH0.L and SLVP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRH0.L | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.90% | -80.47% | -5.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.30% | -38.06% | -2.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.87% | -38.06% | -8.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.27% | -48.01% | -33.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.90% | -62.03% | -23.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -67.56% | -34.83% | -32.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.59% | -46.74% | -3.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.21% | 15.80% | +5.41% |
Volatility
XRH0.L vs. SLVP - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) has a higher volatility of 28.09% compared to iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) at 19.38%. This indicates that XRH0.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLVP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRH0.L | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.09% | 19.38% | +8.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 70.45% | 45.84% | +24.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 89.78% | 55.46% | +34.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.02% | 43.37% | +25.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.84% | 42.51% | +24.33% |
XRH0.L vs. SLVP - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRH0.L has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SLVP's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRH0.L vs. SLVP - Dividend Comparison
XRH0.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SLVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | 2.28% | 1.78% | 1.05% | 0.88% | 0.63% | 1.63% | 2.39% | 2.03% | 1.28% | 0.85% | 2.32% | 0.72% |
XRH0.L Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XRH0.L and SLVP have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SLVP is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SLVP is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for XRH0.L.
XRH0.L is categorized as Metals, while SLVP is Silver. XRH0.L tracks Rhodium, while SLVP tracks MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for XRH0.L and 0.39% for SLVP.
Find the right allocation for XRH0.L and SLVP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer