XRH0.L vs. SILJ

Last updated Jul 1, 2026

XRH0.L (Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC) and SILJ (Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XRH0.L is a Metals fund tracking the Rhodium, while SILJ is a Silver fund tracking the Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XRH0.L returned 27.32%/yr vs 6.55%/yr for SILJ. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XRH0.L charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for SILJ.

Performance

XRH0.L vs. SILJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) and Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRH0.L achieves a -28.17% return, which is significantly lower than SILJ's -6.32% return. Over the past 10 years, XRH0.L has outperformed SILJ with an annualized return of 27.32%, while SILJ has yielded a comparatively lower 6.55% annualized return.

XRH0.L

• 1D: 1.54%
• 1M: -10.60%
• YTD: -28.17%
• 6M: -23.84%
• 1Y: 40.60%
• 3Y*: 18.05%
• 5Y*: -15.19%
• 10Y*: 27.32%

SILJ

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: -16.14%
• YTD: -6.32%
• 6M: -7.86%
• 1Y: 78.43%
• 3Y*: 44.49%
• 5Y*: 13.48%
• 10Y*: 6.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRH0.L vs. SILJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XRH0.L Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC	-28.17%	205.23%	-14.69%	-60.81%	-4.46%	-15.51%	183.21%	132.83%	46.39%	100.00%
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF	-6.32%	183.89%	6.39%	-5.21%	-15.42%	-23.21%	33.00%	57.06%	-27.95%	-5.65%

Correlation

The correlation between XRH0.L and SILJ is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.11
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2012	0.07

The correlation between XRH0.L and SILJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (10 years) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

XRH0.L vs. SILJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRH0.L

XRH0.L Risk / Return Rank: 22
XRH0.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
XRH0.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
XRH0.L Omega Ratio Rank: 27
XRH0.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
XRH0.L Martin Ratio Rank: 19

SILJ

SILJ Risk / Return Rank: 41
SILJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
SILJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
SILJ Omega Ratio Rank: 42
SILJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
SILJ Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRH0.L vs. SILJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) and Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XRH0.L	SILJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.45	1.37	-0.92
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.33	1.83	-0.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.24	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.00	2.01	-1.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.91	4.72	-2.81

XRH0.L vs. SILJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XRH0.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the SILJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XRH0.L and SILJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XRH0.L vs. SILJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRH0.L drawdown since its inception was -85.90%, which is greater than SILJ's maximum drawdown of -79.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRH0.L and SILJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	XRH0.L	SILJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.90%	-79.04%	-6.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-40.30%	-39.16%	-1.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-46.87%	-39.16%	-7.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-81.27%	-48.81%	-32.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-85.90%	-70.06%	-15.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-67.56%	-35.68%	-31.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-50.59%	-41.38%	-9.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.21%	16.67%	+4.54%

Volatility

XRH0.L vs. SILJ - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) has a higher volatility of 28.09% compared to Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) at 20.11%. This indicates that XRH0.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SILJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XRH0.L	SILJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	28.09%	20.11%	+7.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	70.45%	48.09%	+22.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	89.78%	57.53%	+32.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	69.02%	44.96%	+24.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	66.84%	46.43%	+20.41%

XRH0.L vs. SILJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRH0.L has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SILJ's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

XRH0.L vs. SILJ - Dividend Comparison

XRH0.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SILJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF	2.14%	2.00%	7.26%	0.01%	0.05%	0.36%	1.23%	1.45%	1.66%	0.00%	0.52%	2.46%
XRH0.L Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XRH0.L and SILJ in my portfolio?

XRH0.L and SILJ have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XRH0.L or SILJ?

On fees, SILJ is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XRH0.L or SILJ?

SILJ is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for XRH0.L.

What is the main difference between XRH0.L and SILJ?

XRH0.L is categorized as Metals, while SILJ is Silver. XRH0.L tracks Rhodium, while SILJ tracks Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for XRH0.L and 0.69% for SILJ.