XRH0.L vs. PPLT
XRH0.L (Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC) and PPLT (abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XRH0.L is a Metals fund tracking the Rhodium, while PPLT is a Precious Metals fund tracking the LBMA Platinum Price PM. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XRH0.L returned 27.32%/yr vs 3.32%/yr for PPLT. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XRH0.L charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PPLT.
Performance
XRH0.L vs. PPLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRH0.L achieves a -28.17% return, which is significantly lower than PPLT's -24.21% return. Over the past 10 years, XRH0.L has outperformed PPLT with an annualized return of 27.32%, while PPLT has yielded a comparatively lower 3.32% annualized return.
XRH0.L
- 1D
- 1.54%
- 1M
- -10.60%
- YTD
- -28.17%
- 6M
- -23.84%
- 1Y
- 40.60%
- 3Y*
- 18.05%
- 5Y*
- -15.19%
- 10Y*
- 27.32%
PPLT
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- -19.03%
- YTD
- -24.21%
- 6M
- -28.86%
- 1Y
- 15.00%
- 3Y*
- 19.09%
- 5Y*
- 6.84%
- 10Y*
- 3.32%
XRH0.L vs. PPLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XRH0.L Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC | -28.17% | 205.23% | -14.69% | -60.81% | -4.46% | -15.51% | 183.21% | 132.83% | 46.39% | 100.00% |
PPLT abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF | -24.21% | 124.48% | -8.90% | -8.18% | 10.43% | -10.75% | 10.78% | 20.85% | -14.95% | 2.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRH0.L and PPLT is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2011 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRH0.L vs. PPLT — Risk / Return Rank
XRH0.L
PPLT
XRH0.L vs. PPLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) and abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XRH0.L | PPLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.10 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | 0.34 | +0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.91 | 0.78 | +1.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XRH0.L vs. PPLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRH0.L drawdown since its inception was -85.90%, which is greater than PPLT's maximum drawdown of -70.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRH0.L and PPLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRH0.L | PPLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.90% | -70.73% | -15.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.30% | -43.98% | +3.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.87% | -43.98% | -2.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.27% | -43.98% | -37.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.90% | -51.14% | -34.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -67.56% | -43.98% | -23.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.59% | -39.94% | -10.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.21% | 19.30% | +1.91% |
Volatility
XRH0.L vs. PPLT - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) has a higher volatility of 28.09% compared to abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) at 12.58%. This indicates that XRH0.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRH0.L | PPLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.09% | 12.58% | +15.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 70.45% | 43.67% | +26.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 89.78% | 50.52% | +39.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.02% | 32.78% | +36.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.84% | 29.21% | +37.63% |
XRH0.L vs. PPLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRH0.L has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than PPLT's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRH0.L vs. PPLT - Dividend Comparison
Neither XRH0.L nor PPLT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XRH0.L and PPLT have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PPLT is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PPLT is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for XRH0.L.
XRH0.L is categorized as Metals, while PPLT is Precious Metals. XRH0.L tracks Rhodium, while PPLT tracks LBMA Platinum Price PM. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for XRH0.L and 0.60% for PPLT.
Find the right allocation for XRH0.L and PPLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer