XRH0.L vs. ALUM.L
XRH0.L (Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC) and ALUM.L (WisdomTree Aluminium) are both Metals funds - XRH0.L tracks the Rhodium while ALUM.L tracks the Bloomberg Aluminum. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XRH0.L returned 29.93%/yr vs 6.81%/yr for ALUM.L. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XRH0.L charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for ALUM.L.
Performance
XRH0.L vs. ALUM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRH0.L achieves a -15.28% return, which is significantly lower than ALUM.L's 25.85% return. Over the past 10 years, XRH0.L has outperformed ALUM.L with an annualized return of 29.93%, while ALUM.L has yielded a comparatively lower 6.81% annualized return.
XRH0.L
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -3.00%
- YTD
- -15.28%
- 6M
- 10.23%
- 1Y
- 73.21%
- 3Y*
- 18.90%
- 5Y*
- -13.58%
- 10Y*
- 29.93%
ALUM.L
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 2.73%
- YTD
- 25.85%
- 6M
- 29.08%
- 1Y
- 52.01%
- 3Y*
- 17.40%
- 5Y*
- 7.40%
- 10Y*
- 6.81%
XRH0.L vs. ALUM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XRH0.L Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC | -15.28% | 205.23% | -14.69% | -60.81% | -4.46% | -15.51% | 183.21% | 132.83% | 46.39% | 100.00% |
ALUM.L WisdomTree Aluminium | 25.85% | 17.98% | 4.62% | -4.48% | -15.92% | 38.11% | 1.95% | -3.12% | -18.30% | 29.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRH0.L and ALUM.L is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2011 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRH0.L vs. ALUM.L — Risk / Return Rank
XRH0.L
ALUM.L
XRH0.L vs. ALUM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) and WisdomTree Aluminium (ALUM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XRH0.L | ALUM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.48 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.12 | 5.84 | -3.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.10 | 20.87 | -16.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XRH0.L | ALUM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 2.85 | -1.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.21 | 0.32 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.34 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | -0.11 | +0.31 |
Drawdowns
XRH0.L vs. ALUM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRH0.L drawdown since its inception was -85.90%, which is greater than ALUM.L's maximum drawdown of -77.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRH0.L and ALUM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRH0.L | ALUM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.90% | -77.63% | -8.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.33% | -8.86% | -25.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.87% | -20.63% | -26.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.47% | -47.34% | -35.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.90% | -47.34% | -38.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.74% | -49.28% | -12.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.31% | -58.59% | +7.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.81% | 2.48% | +15.33% |
Volatility
XRH0.L vs. ALUM.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) has a higher volatility of 12.10% compared to WisdomTree Aluminium (ALUM.L) at 6.12%. This indicates that XRH0.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALUM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRH0.L | ALUM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.10% | 6.12% | +5.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.72% | 15.69% | +37.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.00% | 18.20% | +52.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.08% | 22.79% | +41.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.25% | 20.01% | +44.24% |
XRH0.L vs. ALUM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRH0.L has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than ALUM.L's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRH0.L vs. ALUM.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XRH0.L nor ALUM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XRH0.L and ALUM.L have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ALUM.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ALUM.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for XRH0.L.
XRH0.L tracks Rhodium, while ALUM.L tracks Bloomberg Aluminum. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for XRH0.L and 0.49% for ALUM.L.
Find the right allocation for XRH0.L and ALUM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer