ALUM.L vs. ZINC.L
Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree Aluminium (ALUM.L) and WisdomTree Zinc (ZINC.L).
ALUM.L and ZINC.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ALUM.L is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Aluminum. It was launched on Sep 22, 2006. ZINC.L is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Zinc. It was launched on Sep 22, 2006. Both ALUM.L and ZINC.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ALUM.L vs. ZINC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ALUM.L vs. ZINC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALUM.L WisdomTree Aluminium | 20.18% | 17.98% | 4.62% | -4.48% | -15.92% | 38.11% | 1.95% | -3.12% | -18.30% | 29.16% |
ZINC.L WisdomTree Zinc | 6.66% | 6.70% | 13.11% | -9.01% | -11.08% | 26.65% | 15.73% | -0.07% | -22.41% | 27.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALUM.L achieves a 20.18% return, which is significantly higher than ZINC.L's 6.66% return. Over the past 10 years, ALUM.L has underperformed ZINC.L with an annualized return of 6.33%, while ZINC.L has yielded a comparatively higher 7.40% annualized return.
ALUM.L
- 1D
- 1.70%
- 1M
- 12.26%
- YTD
- 20.18%
- 6M
- 33.16%
- 1Y
- 43.39%
- 3Y*
- 12.60%
- 5Y*
- 8.22%
- 10Y*
- 6.33%
ZINC.L
- 1D
- 2.39%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- YTD
- 6.66%
- 6M
- 13.57%
- 1Y
- 22.25%
- 3Y*
- 6.04%
- 5Y*
- 5.59%
- 10Y*
- 7.40%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ALUM.L vs. ZINC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ALUM.L and ZINC.L have an expense ratio of 0.49%.
Return for Risk
ALUM.L vs. ZINC.L — Risk / Return Rank
ALUM.L
ZINC.L
ALUM.L vs. ZINC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Aluminium (ALUM.L) and WisdomTree Zinc (ZINC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ALUM.L | ZINC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.40 | 1.16 | +1.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.30 | 1.72 | +1.58 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.20 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.02 | 2.24 | +2.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.19 | 7.46 | +9.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ALUM.L | ZINC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 1.16 | +1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.22 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 0.31 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.12 | -0.05 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between ALUM.L and ZINC.L is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ALUM.L vs. ZINC.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ALUM.L nor ZINC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
ALUM.L vs. ZINC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALUM.L drawdown since its inception was -77.63%, roughly equal to the maximum ZINC.L drawdown of -77.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALUM.L and ZINC.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALUM.L | ZINC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.63% | -77.49% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.86% | -10.74% | +1.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.34% | -47.04% | -0.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.34% | -47.04% | -0.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.57% | -41.97% | -9.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.67% | -56.54% | -2.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 3.23% | -0.65% |
Volatility
ALUM.L vs. ZINC.L - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Aluminium (ALUM.L) has a higher volatility of 9.70% compared to WisdomTree Zinc (ZINC.L) at 6.61%. This indicates that ALUM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZINC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ALUM.L | ZINC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.70% | 6.61% | +3.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.55% | 14.19% | +0.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.05% | 19.17% | -1.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.76% | 25.35% | -2.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.96% | 24.09% | -4.13% |