PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALUM.L vs. AMPS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ALUM.L vs. AMPS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Aluminium (ALUM.L) and WisdomTree Battery Metals (AMPS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ALUM.L vs. AMPS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ALUM.L
WisdomTree Aluminium
20.18%17.98%4.62%-4.48%-13.03%
AMPS.L
WisdomTree Battery Metals
5.70%17.34%-0.96%-24.30%-1.13%
Different Trading Currencies

ALUM.L is traded in USD, while AMPS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the AMPS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALUM.L achieves a 20.18% return, which is significantly higher than AMPS.L's 5.70% return.


ALUM.L

1D
1.70%
1M
12.26%
YTD
20.18%
6M
33.16%
1Y
43.39%
3Y*
12.60%
5Y*
8.22%
10Y*
6.33%

AMPS.L

1D
1.13%
1M
0.66%
YTD
5.70%
6M
16.65%
1Y
17.38%
3Y*
1.60%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ALUM.L vs. AMPS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALUM.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than AMPS.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ALUM.L vs. AMPS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALUM.L
ALUM.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
ALUM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALUM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALUM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
ALUM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALUM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

AMPS.L
AMPS.L Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
AMPS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMPS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMPS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
AMPS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMPS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALUM.L vs. AMPS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Aluminium (ALUM.L) and WisdomTree Battery Metals (AMPS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ALUM.LAMPS.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.40

1.00

+1.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.30

1.38

+1.92

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.19

+0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.02

2.02

+3.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.19

4.87

+12.32

ALUM.L vs. AMPS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALUM.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is higher than the AMPS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALUM.L and AMPS.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ALUM.LAMPS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

1.00

+1.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.12

-0.10

-0.02

Correlation

The correlation between ALUM.L and AMPS.L is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

ALUM.L vs. AMPS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ALUM.L nor AMPS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

ALUM.L vs. AMPS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALUM.L drawdown since its inception was -77.63%, which is greater than AMPS.L's maximum drawdown of -33.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALUM.L and AMPS.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ALUM.LAMPS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.63%

-35.07%

-42.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.86%

-8.95%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-51.57%

-17.92%

-33.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.67%

-24.08%

-34.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

3.63%

-1.05%

Volatility

ALUM.L vs. AMPS.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Aluminium (ALUM.L) has a higher volatility of 9.70% compared to WisdomTree Battery Metals (AMPS.L) at 4.86%. This indicates that ALUM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMPS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ALUM.LAMPS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.70%

4.86%

+4.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.55%

12.24%

+2.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.05%

17.37%

+0.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.76%

21.84%

+0.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.96%

21.84%

-1.88%