XPPT.L vs. ISLN.L
XPPT.L (Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities) and ISLN.L (iShares Physical Silver ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - XPPT.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Platinum, while ISLN.L is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XPPT.L returned 9.70%/yr vs 21.30%/yr for ISLN.L. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XPPT.L charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ISLN.L.
Performance
XPPT.L vs. ISLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XPPT.L achieves a -5.42% return, which is significantly lower than ISLN.L's 2.87% return.
XPPT.L
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -4.24%
- YTD
- -5.42%
- 6M
- 14.44%
- 1Y
- 72.34%
- 3Y*
- 21.72%
- 5Y*
- 9.70%
- 10Y*
- —
ISLN.L
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- 2.87%
- 6M
- 29.09%
- 1Y
- 113.78%
- 3Y*
- 45.97%
- 5Y*
- 21.30%
- 10Y*
- 15.84%
XPPT.L vs. ISLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XPPT.L Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities | -5.42% | 118.57% | -9.77% | -5.84% | 9.77% | -10.80% | 36.71% |
ISLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | 2.87% | 147.59% | 21.12% | -0.77% | 3.39% | -12.85% | 70.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between XPPT.L and ISLN.L is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2020 | 0.65 |
The correlation between XPPT.L and ISLN.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (5 years) to 0.76 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XPPT.L vs. ISLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
XPPT.L
ISLN.L
XPPT.L vs. ISLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities (XPPT.L) and iShares Physical Silver ETC (ISLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XPPT.L | ISLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.35 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | 2.78 | -0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.26 | 6.08 | -1.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XPPT.L | ISLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | 1.99 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.60 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.12 | +0.34 |
Drawdowns
XPPT.L vs. ISLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XPPT.L drawdown since its inception was -36.92%, smaller than the maximum ISLN.L drawdown of -76.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPPT.L and ISLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XPPT.L | ISLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.92% | -76.63% | +39.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.12% | -40.67% | +5.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.12% | -40.67% | +5.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.12% | -40.67% | +5.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.35% | -35.25% | +1.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.04% | -54.28% | +34.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.94% | 18.63% | -1.69% |
Volatility
XPPT.L vs. ISLN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities (XPPT.L) is 11.59%, while iShares Physical Silver ETC (ISLN.L) has a volatility of 17.61%. This indicates that XPPT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XPPT.L | ISLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.59% | 17.61% | -6.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.18% | 54.22% | -11.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.62% | 56.90% | -8.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.46% | 35.49% | -3.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.85% | 30.92% | +1.93% |
XPPT.L vs. ISLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XPPT.L has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than ISLN.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
XPPT.L vs. ISLN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XPPT.L nor ISLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XPPT.L and ISLN.L have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ISLN.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ISLN.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for XPPT.L.
XPPT.L is categorized as Precious Metals, while ISLN.L is Silver. XPPT.L tracks Platinum, while ISLN.L tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for XPPT.L and 0.20% for ISLN.L.
Find the right allocation for XPPT.L and ISLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer