ISLN.L vs. SSLN.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Physical Silver ETC (ISLN.L) and iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L).
ISLN.L and SSLN.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ISLN.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the LBMA Silver Price. It was launched on Apr 8, 2011. SSLN.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Silver. It was launched on Apr 8, 2011. Both ISLN.L and SSLN.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ISLN.L vs. SSLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ISLN.L vs. SSLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | 2.95% | 147.59% | 21.12% | -0.77% | 3.39% | -12.85% | 45.85% | 16.35% | -8.76% | 3.68% |
SSLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | 3.26% | 147.64% | 21.15% | -1.25% | 3.38% | -12.44% | 45.04% | 17.20% | -8.94% | 3.39% |
Different Trading Currencies
ISLN.L is traded in USD, while SSLN.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SSLN.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISLN.L achieves a 2.95% return, which is significantly lower than SSLN.L's 3.26% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ISLN.L having a 17.06% annualized return and SSLN.L not far ahead at 17.07%.
ISLN.L
- 1D
- 3.74%
- 1M
- -20.91%
- YTD
- 2.95%
- 6M
- 59.13%
- 1Y
- 117.12%
- 3Y*
- 45.01%
- 5Y*
- 24.17%
- 10Y*
- 17.06%
SSLN.L
- 1D
- 4.03%
- 1M
- -20.88%
- YTD
- 3.26%
- 6M
- 59.40%
- 1Y
- 117.44%
- 3Y*
- 45.26%
- 5Y*
- 24.54%
- 10Y*
- 17.07%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ISLN.L vs. SSLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ISLN.L and SSLN.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
ISLN.L vs. SSLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
ISLN.L
SSLN.L
ISLN.L vs. SSLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Silver ETC (ISLN.L) and iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ISLN.L | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.16 | 2.19 | -0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.44 | 2.44 | 0.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.39 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.90 | 2.90 | 0.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.05 | 9.03 | +0.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ISLN.L | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.16 | 2.19 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.72 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.57 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between ISLN.L and SSLN.L is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ISLN.L vs. SSLN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ISLN.L nor SSLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
ISLN.L vs. SSLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISLN.L drawdown since its inception was -76.63%, roughly equal to the maximum SSLN.L drawdown of -76.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISLN.L and SSLN.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISLN.L | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.63% | -69.95% | -6.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.67% | -38.72% | -1.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.67% | -38.72% | -1.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.90% | -38.72% | -4.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.20% | -32.45% | -2.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.54% | -45.48% | -9.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.02% | 12.40% | +0.62% |
Volatility
ISLN.L vs. SSLN.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Physical Silver ETC (ISLN.L) and iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) have volatilities of 18.48% and 17.65%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ISLN.L | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.48% | 17.65% | +0.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.90% | 51.33% | +0.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.84% | 53.38% | +0.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.26% | 34.16% | +0.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.26% | 30.41% | -0.15% |