PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XPPT.L vs. GLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XPPT.L vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities (XPPT.L) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XPPT.L vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XPPT.L
Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities
-1.03%118.57%-9.77%-5.84%9.77%-10.80%36.71%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
8.35%63.68%26.66%12.69%-0.77%-4.15%10.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XPPT.L achieves a -1.03% return, which is significantly lower than GLD's 8.35% return.


XPPT.L

1D
0.02%
1M
-5.46%
YTD
-1.03%
6M
27.32%
1Y
102.47%
3Y*
25.30%
5Y*
9.87%
10Y*

GLD

1D
-1.92%
1M
-8.27%
YTD
8.35%
6M
21.03%
1Y
49.02%
3Y*
32.51%
5Y*
21.53%
10Y*
13.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XPPT.L vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

XPPT.L has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XPPT.L vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XPPT.L
XPPT.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
XPPT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XPPT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
XPPT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
XPPT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
XPPT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XPPT.L vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities (XPPT.L) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XPPT.LGLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.17

1.77

+0.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.41

2.19

+0.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.32

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

2.57

+0.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.78

9.28

-0.50

XPPT.L vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XPPT.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XPPT.L and GLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XPPT.LGLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

1.77

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

1.22

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.62

-0.12

Correlation

The correlation between XPPT.L and GLD is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

XPPT.L vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

Neither XPPT.L nor GLD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

XPPT.L vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XPPT.L drawdown since its inception was -36.92%, smaller than the maximum GLD drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPPT.L and GLD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XPPT.LGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.92%

-45.56%

+8.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.12%

-19.21%

-15.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.12%

-21.03%

-14.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.26%

-13.41%

-16.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.79%

-16.17%

-3.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.10%

5.32%

+6.78%

Volatility

XPPT.L vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities (XPPT.L) has a higher volatility of 14.72% compared to SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) at 10.54%. This indicates that XPPT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XPPT.LGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.72%

10.54%

+4.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.48%

24.43%

+18.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.09%

27.89%

+19.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.04%

17.76%

+14.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.69%

15.89%

+16.80%