XPPT.L vs. XCX5.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities (XPPT.L) and Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCX5.L).
XPPT.L and XCX5.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XPPT.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Platinum. It was launched on Apr 16, 2020. XCX5.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI India NR USD. It was launched on Jun 24, 2010. Both XPPT.L and XCX5.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XPPT.L vs. XCX5.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XPPT.L vs. XCX5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XPPT.L Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities | -1.05% | 118.57% | -9.77% | -5.84% | 9.77% | -10.80% | 36.71% |
XCX5.L Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C | -16.19% | 2.00% | 10.06% | 18.50% | -8.61% | 25.05% | 58.23% |
Different Trading Currencies
XPPT.L is traded in USD, while XCX5.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XCX5.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XPPT.L achieves a -1.05% return, which is significantly higher than XCX5.L's -16.19% return.
XPPT.L
- 1D
- 2.35%
- 1M
- -13.41%
- YTD
- -1.05%
- 6M
- 27.18%
- 1Y
- 98.56%
- 3Y*
- 25.18%
- 5Y*
- 9.87%
- 10Y*
- —
XCX5.L
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- -7.14%
- YTD
- -16.19%
- 6M
- -12.61%
- 1Y
- -11.88%
- 3Y*
- 6.39%
- 5Y*
- 3.71%
- 10Y*
- 6.59%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XPPT.L vs. XCX5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XPPT.L has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than XCX5.L's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XPPT.L vs. XCX5.L — Risk / Return Rank
XPPT.L
XCX5.L
XPPT.L vs. XCX5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities (XPPT.L) and Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCX5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XPPT.L | XCX5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.08 | -0.69 | +2.78 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.35 | -0.89 | +3.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 0.90 | +0.45 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | -0.51 | +3.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.56 | -1.58 | +10.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XPPT.L | XCX5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.08 | -0.69 | +2.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.22 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.15 | +0.35 |
Correlation
The correlation between XPPT.L and XCX5.L is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
XPPT.L vs. XCX5.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XPPT.L nor XCX5.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XPPT.L vs. XCX5.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XPPT.L drawdown since its inception was -36.92%, smaller than the maximum XCX5.L drawdown of -45.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPPT.L and XCX5.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XPPT.L | XCX5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.92% | -41.74% | +4.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.12% | -19.88% | -15.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.12% | -26.47% | -8.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.27% | -24.89% | -5.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.78% | -10.91% | -8.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.96% | 6.58% | +5.38% |
Volatility
XPPT.L vs. XCX5.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities (XPPT.L) has a higher volatility of 14.99% compared to Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCX5.L) at 6.93%. This indicates that XPPT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCX5.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XPPT.L | XCX5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.99% | 6.93% | +8.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.63% | 11.74% | +30.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.10% | 17.10% | +30.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.05% | 17.06% | +14.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.70% | 20.56% | +12.14% |