XPPT.L vs. EGLN.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities (XPPT.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L).
XPPT.L and EGLN.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XPPT.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Platinum. It was launched on Apr 16, 2020. EGLN.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold Price. It was launched on Apr 8, 2011. Both XPPT.L and EGLN.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XPPT.L vs. EGLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XPPT.L vs. EGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XPPT.L Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities | -1.03% | 118.57% | -9.77% | -5.84% | 9.77% | -10.80% | 36.71% |
EGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | 8.30% | 65.63% | 26.01% | 12.82% | -0.37% | -3.23% | 9.33% |
Different Trading Currencies
XPPT.L is traded in USD, while EGLN.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the EGLN.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XPPT.L achieves a -1.03% return, which is significantly lower than EGLN.L's 8.30% return.
XPPT.L
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -5.46%
- YTD
- -1.03%
- 6M
- 27.32%
- 1Y
- 102.47%
- 3Y*
- 25.30%
- 5Y*
- 9.87%
- 10Y*
- —
EGLN.L
- 1D
- -2.21%
- 1M
- -9.00%
- YTD
- 8.30%
- 6M
- 21.56%
- 1Y
- 49.29%
- 3Y*
- 32.70%
- 5Y*
- 21.82%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XPPT.L vs. EGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XPPT.L has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than EGLN.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XPPT.L vs. EGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
XPPT.L
EGLN.L
XPPT.L vs. EGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities (XPPT.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XPPT.L | EGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.17 | 1.85 | +0.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.41 | 2.35 | +0.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.34 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.03 | 2.91 | +0.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.78 | 10.94 | -2.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XPPT.L | EGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.17 | 1.85 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 1.26 | -0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 1.00 | -0.50 |
Correlation
The correlation between XPPT.L and EGLN.L is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
XPPT.L vs. EGLN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XPPT.L nor EGLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XPPT.L vs. EGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XPPT.L drawdown since its inception was -36.92%, which is greater than EGLN.L's maximum drawdown of -21.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPPT.L and EGLN.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XPPT.L | EGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.92% | -18.35% | -18.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.12% | -16.70% | -18.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.12% | -16.70% | -18.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.26% | -10.82% | -19.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.79% | -6.24% | -13.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.10% | 4.46% | +7.64% |
Volatility
XPPT.L vs. EGLN.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities (XPPT.L) has a higher volatility of 14.72% compared to iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L) at 10.80%. This indicates that XPPT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XPPT.L | EGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.72% | 10.80% | +3.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.48% | 21.83% | +20.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.09% | 26.46% | +20.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.04% | 17.24% | +14.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.69% | 15.58% | +17.11% |