XPPT.L vs. ESGP.L

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities (XPPT.L) and HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ESGP.L).

XPPT.L and ESGP.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XPPT.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Platinum. It was launched on Apr 16, 2020. ESGP.L is a passively managed fund by HANetf that tracks the performance of the EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD. It was launched on Jul 2, 2021. Both XPPT.L and ESGP.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

XPPT.L vs. ESGP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities (XPPT.L) and HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ESGP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XPPT.L vs. ESGP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XPPT.L Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities	-1.03%	118.57%	-9.77%	-5.84%	9.77%	-11.46%
ESGP.L HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF	10.66%	154.57%	1.45%	4.87%	-8.78%	-5.30%

Different Trading Currencies

XPPT.L is traded in USD, while ESGP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ESGP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XPPT.L achieves a -1.03% return, which is significantly lower than ESGP.L's 10.66% return.

XPPT.L

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: -5.46%
• YTD: -1.03%
• 6M: 27.32%
• 1Y: 102.47%
• 3Y*: 25.30%
• 5Y*: 9.87%
• 10Y*: —

ESGP.L

• 1D: -2.47%
• 1M: -11.69%
• YTD: 10.66%
• 6M: 21.64%
• 1Y: 109.59%
• 3Y*: 39.16%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XPPT.L vs. ESGP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XPPT.L has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than ESGP.L's 0.60% expense ratio.

ESGP.L

HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF

XPPT.L

Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities

Return for Risk

XPPT.L vs. ESGP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XPPT.L

XPPT.L Risk / Return Rank: 83
XPPT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
XPPT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
XPPT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 86
XPPT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
XPPT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 69

ESGP.L

ESGP.L Risk / Return Rank: 92
ESGP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
ESGP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
ESGP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 90
ESGP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
ESGP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XPPT.L vs. ESGP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities (XPPT.L) and HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ESGP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XPPT.L	ESGP.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.17	2.54	-0.37
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.41	2.82	-0.41
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.37	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.03	3.80	-0.77
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.78	12.87	-4.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XPPT.L vs. ESGP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XPPT.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the ESGP.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XPPT.L and ESGP.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XPPT.L	ESGP.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.17	2.54	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.62	-0.12

Correlation

The correlation between XPPT.L and ESGP.L is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

XPPT.L vs. ESGP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XPPT.L nor ESGP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

XPPT.L vs. ESGP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XPPT.L drawdown since its inception was -36.92%, smaller than the maximum ESGP.L drawdown of -46.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPPT.L and ESGP.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XPPT.L	ESGP.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.92%	-36.54%	-0.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.12%	-28.67%	-6.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-30.26%	-16.71%	-13.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.79%	-13.27%	-6.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.10%	8.09%	+4.01%

Volatility

XPPT.L vs. ESGP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities (XPPT.L) is 14.72%, while HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ESGP.L) has a volatility of 17.27%. This indicates that XPPT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESGP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XPPT.L	ESGP.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.72%	17.27%	-2.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.48%	34.92%	+7.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.09%	42.93%	+4.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.04%	35.75%	-3.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.69%	35.75%	-3.06%