EGLN.L vs. SXR8.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXR8.DE).
EGLN.L and SXR8.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EGLN.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold Price. It was launched on Apr 8, 2011. SXR8.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on May 19, 2010. Both EGLN.L and SXR8.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EGLN.L or SXR8.DE.
Correlation
The correlation between EGLN.L and SXR8.DE is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
EGLN.L vs. SXR8.DE - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
EGLN.L:
3.46
SXR8.DE:
2.12
EGLN.L:
4.43
SXR8.DE:
2.92
EGLN.L:
1.61
SXR8.DE:
1.42
EGLN.L:
9.50
SXR8.DE:
3.26
EGLN.L:
21.87
SXR8.DE:
14.16
EGLN.L:
2.29%
SXR8.DE:
1.90%
EGLN.L:
14.46%
SXR8.DE:
12.70%
EGLN.L:
-18.35%
SXR8.DE:
-33.78%
EGLN.L:
-0.23%
SXR8.DE:
0.00%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EGLN.L achieves a 12.03% return, which is significantly higher than SXR8.DE's 3.87% return.
EGLN.L
12.03%
6.82%
26.03%
50.01%
13.05%
N/A
SXR8.DE
3.87%
1.57%
17.05%
29.33%
15.16%
13.82%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EGLN.L vs. SXR8.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EGLN.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SXR8.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EGLN.L vs. SXR8.DE — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
EGLN.L
SXR8.DE
EGLN.L vs. SXR8.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXR8.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EGLN.L vs. SXR8.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither EGLN.L nor SXR8.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
EGLN.L vs. SXR8.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EGLN.L drawdown since its inception was -18.35%, smaller than the maximum SXR8.DE drawdown of -33.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGLN.L and SXR8.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EGLN.L vs. SXR8.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXR8.DE) have volatilities of 3.24% and 3.18%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.