EGLN.L vs. 4GLD.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L) and Xetra-Gold ETF (4GLD.DE).
EGLN.L and 4GLD.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EGLN.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold Price. It was launched on Apr 8, 2011. 4GLD.DE is a passively managed fund by Xetra that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold Price. It was launched on Nov 27, 2007. Both EGLN.L and 4GLD.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EGLN.L or 4GLD.DE.
Correlation
The correlation between EGLN.L and 4GLD.DE is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
EGLN.L vs. 4GLD.DE - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
EGLN.L:
3.39
4GLD.DE:
3.02
EGLN.L:
4.35
4GLD.DE:
3.98
EGLN.L:
1.60
4GLD.DE:
1.54
EGLN.L:
9.30
4GLD.DE:
7.96
EGLN.L:
21.43
4GLD.DE:
18.72
EGLN.L:
2.29%
4GLD.DE:
2.32%
EGLN.L:
14.46%
4GLD.DE:
14.33%
EGLN.L:
-18.35%
4GLD.DE:
-36.79%
EGLN.L:
-0.33%
4GLD.DE:
0.00%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EGLN.L achieves a 11.91% return, which is significantly higher than 4GLD.DE's 7.73% return.
EGLN.L
11.91%
6.05%
24.84%
50.01%
13.01%
N/A
4GLD.DE
7.73%
5.26%
21.58%
43.40%
13.78%
9.31%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EGLN.L vs. 4GLD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EGLN.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than 4GLD.DE's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EGLN.L vs. 4GLD.DE — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
EGLN.L
4GLD.DE
EGLN.L vs. 4GLD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L) and Xetra-Gold ETF (4GLD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EGLN.L vs. 4GLD.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither EGLN.L nor 4GLD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
EGLN.L vs. 4GLD.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EGLN.L drawdown since its inception was -18.35%, smaller than the maximum 4GLD.DE drawdown of -36.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGLN.L and 4GLD.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EGLN.L vs. 4GLD.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L) has a higher volatility of 3.32% compared to Xetra-Gold ETF (4GLD.DE) at 1.94%. This indicates that EGLN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 4GLD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.