EGLN.L vs. GDX
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L) and VanEck Vectors Gold Miners ETF (GDX).
EGLN.L and GDX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EGLN.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold Price. It was launched on Apr 8, 2011. GDX is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index. It was launched on May 22, 2006. Both EGLN.L and GDX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EGLN.L or GDX.
Correlation
The correlation between EGLN.L and GDX is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
EGLN.L vs. GDX - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
EGLN.L:
3.39
GDX:
1.70
EGLN.L:
4.35
GDX:
2.24
EGLN.L:
1.60
GDX:
1.28
EGLN.L:
9.30
GDX:
0.94
EGLN.L:
21.43
GDX:
5.83
EGLN.L:
2.29%
GDX:
9.08%
EGLN.L:
14.46%
GDX:
31.24%
EGLN.L:
-18.35%
GDX:
-80.57%
EGLN.L:
-0.33%
GDX:
-30.40%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EGLN.L achieves a 11.91% return, which is significantly lower than GDX's 20.32% return.
EGLN.L
11.91%
6.05%
24.84%
50.01%
13.01%
N/A
GDX
20.32%
8.71%
4.93%
57.79%
7.34%
8.25%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EGLN.L vs. GDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EGLN.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than GDX's 0.53% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EGLN.L vs. GDX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
EGLN.L
GDX
EGLN.L vs. GDX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L) and VanEck Vectors Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EGLN.L vs. GDX - Dividend Comparison
EGLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GDX VanEck Vectors Gold Miners ETF | 0.99% | 1.19% | 1.61% | 1.66% | 1.67% | 0.53% | 0.65% | 0.50% | 0.76% | 0.26% | 0.85% | 0.66% |
Drawdowns
EGLN.L vs. GDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EGLN.L drawdown since its inception was -18.35%, smaller than the maximum GDX drawdown of -80.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGLN.L and GDX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EGLN.L vs. GDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L) is 3.32%, while VanEck Vectors Gold Miners ETF (GDX) has a volatility of 8.51%. This indicates that EGLN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.