PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XPPT.DE vs. GLL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XPPT.DE vs. GLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities (XPPT.DE) and ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XPPT.DE is traded in EUR, while GLL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GLL values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XPPT.DE achieves a -26.54% return, which is significantly lower than GLL's 6.12% return.


XPPT.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-16.57%
YTD
-26.54%
6M
-26.47%
1Y
21.98%
3Y*
17.31%
5Y*
8.14%
10Y*

GLL

1D
-1.90%
1M
26.47%
YTD
6.12%
6M
14.60%
1Y
-37.19%
3Y*
-39.30%
5Y*
-27.16%
10Y*
-21.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XPPT.DE vs. GLL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XPPT.DE
Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities
-26.54%114.44%-3.35%-8.94%16.19%-1.94%9.31%
GLL
ProShares UltraShort Gold
6.12%-67.23%-28.93%-17.46%3.95%9.26%-26.80%

Correlation

The correlation between XPPT.DE and GLL is -0.53, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2020

-0.38

The correlation between XPPT.DE and GLL shifts across timeframes, from -0.53 (1 year) to -0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XPPT.DE vs. GLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XPPT.DE
XPPT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
XPPT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XPPT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
XPPT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
XPPT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
XPPT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

GLL
GLL Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
GLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLL Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
GLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLL Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XPPT.DE vs. GLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities (XPPT.DE) and ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XPPT.DEGLLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

0.91

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.53

-0.57

+1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.13

-0.84

+1.97

XPPT.DE vs. GLL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XPPT.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is higher than the GLL Sharpe Ratio of -0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XPPT.DE and GLL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XPPT.DE vs. GLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XPPT.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.74%, smaller than the maximum GLL drawdown of -99.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPPT.DE and GLL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XPPT.DEGLLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.74%

-99.17%

+57.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.74%

-65.97%

+24.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.74%

-89.17%

+47.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.74%

-91.59%

+49.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.74%

-98.57%

+56.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.99%

-84.83%

+69.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.39%

44.27%

-24.88%

Volatility

XPPT.DE vs. GLL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities (XPPT.DE) is 10.14%, while ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) has a volatility of 18.14%. This indicates that XPPT.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XPPT.DEGLLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.14%

18.14%

-8.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.16%

49.15%

-8.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.09%

57.40%

-7.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.89%

40.02%

-8.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.28%

35.83%

-3.55%

XPPT.DE vs. GLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

XPPT.DE has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than GLL's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

XPPT.DE vs. GLL - Dividend Comparison

Neither XPPT.DE nor GLL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XPPT.DE and GLL have a correlation of -0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XPPT.DE is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XPPT.DE is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for GLL.

XPPT.DE is categorized as Precious Metals, while GLL is Leveraged Commodities. XPPT.DE tracks Platinum, while GLL tracks Bloomberg Gold (-200%). They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for XPPT.DE and 0.95% for GLL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XPPT.DE and GLL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer