XPP vs. USD
XPP (ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50) and USD (ProShares Ultra Semiconductors) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - XPP tracks the FTSE/Xinhua China 25 Index (200%) while USD tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XPP returned -6.70%/yr vs 62.72%/yr for USD. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
XPP vs. USD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XPP achieves a -34.24% return, which is significantly lower than USD's 92.18% return. Over the past 10 years, XPP has underperformed USD with an annualized return of -6.70%, while USD has yielded a comparatively higher 62.72% annualized return.
XPP
- 1D
- -4.68%
- 1M
- -21.13%
- YTD
- -34.24%
- 6M
- -35.23%
- 1Y
- -31.54%
- 3Y*
- 0.47%
- 5Y*
- -23.89%
- 10Y*
- -6.70%
USD
- 1D
- 4.73%
- 1M
- -0.57%
- YTD
- 92.18%
- 6M
- 86.88%
- 1Y
- 185.02%
- 3Y*
- 118.50%
- 5Y*
- 64.73%
- 10Y*
- 62.72%
XPP vs. USD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XPP ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 | -34.24% | 45.84% | 38.18% | -34.77% | -50.06% | -40.45% | 7.07% | 24.88% | -31.36% | 80.21% |
USD ProShares Ultra Semiconductors | 92.18% | 62.08% | 139.64% | 228.79% | -68.57% | 104.27% | 68.16% | 110.37% | -26.88% | 81.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between XPP and USD is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2009 | 0.49 |
The correlation between XPP and USD shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (3 years) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XPP vs. USD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XPP
USD
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
XPP
USD
Basic Materials
XPP
-
USD
-
Communication Services
XPP
-
USD
-
Consumer Cyclical
XPP
-
USD
-
Consumer Defensive
XPP
-
USD
-
Energy
XPP
-
USD
Healthcare
XPP
-
USD
-
Industrials
XPP
-
USD
-
Real Estate
XPP
-
USD
-
Technology
XPP
-
USD
Utilities
XPP
-
USD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XPP vs. USD — Risk / Return Rank
XPP
USD
XPP vs. USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP) and ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XPP | USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.38 | -0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.71 | 5.86 | -6.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.73 | 16.16 | -17.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XPP vs. USD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XPP drawdown since its inception was -89.90%, roughly equal to the maximum USD drawdown of -88.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPP and USD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XPP | USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.90% | -88.63% | -1.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.65% | -31.80% | -12.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.95% | -64.46% | +11.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -85.24% | -77.85% | -7.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.90% | -77.85% | -12.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -82.59% | -11.21% | -71.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.92% | -32.29% | -15.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.20% | 11.50% | +6.70% |
Volatility
XPP vs. USD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP) is 13.07%, while ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD) has a volatility of 33.79%. This indicates that XPP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XPP | USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.07% | 33.79% | -20.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.87% | 53.90% | -24.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.37% | 67.84% | -28.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.86% | 77.74% | -14.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.80% | 69.82% | -15.02% |
XPP vs. USD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XPP and USD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
XPP vs. USD - Dividend Comparison
XPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, more than USD's 0.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USD ProShares Ultra Semiconductors | 0.30% | 0.39% | 0.10% | 0.05% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 0.72% | 0.93% | 0.32% | 0.46% | 0.39% |
XPP ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 | 3.18% | 2.32% | 2.96% | 2.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.81% | 1.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XPP and USD have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USD has higher volatility (33.79%) compared to XPP (13.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XPP dropped -89.90% vs USD's -88.63%.
On 10-year performance, USD leads with 62.72% vs -6.70% for XPP. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, XPP has been the lower-risk option at 13.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, USD has performed better with a 62.72% return vs -6.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XPP and USD have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
XPP has the higher dividend yield at 3.18%, compared with 0.30% for USD.
XPP tracks FTSE/Xinhua China 25 Index (200%), while USD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (200%).
USD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XPP and USD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer