XPP vs. QTAP
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP).
XPP and QTAP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XPP is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE/Xinhua China 25 Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 2, 2009. QTAP is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Apr 1, 2021.
Performance
XPP vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XPP vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XPP ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 | -16.13% | 45.84% | 38.18% | -34.77% | -50.06% | -41.89% |
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 3.02% | 19.36% | 17.34% | 43.32% | -25.87% | 15.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XPP achieves a -16.13% return, which is significantly lower than QTAP's 3.02% return.
XPP
- 1D
- -1.79%
- 1M
- -8.28%
- YTD
- -16.13%
- 6M
- -28.23%
- 1Y
- -7.96%
- 3Y*
- 1.80%
- 5Y*
- -20.38%
- 10Y*
- -5.13%
QTAP
- 1D
- 1.74%
- 1M
- 1.79%
- YTD
- 3.02%
- 6M
- 5.43%
- 1Y
- 21.08%
- 3Y*
- 19.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XPP vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
XPP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XPP vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank
XPP
QTAP
XPP vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XPP | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | 1.29 | -1.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.09 | 2.05 | -1.96 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.50 | -0.49 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.26 | 1.81 | -2.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.66 | 12.95 | -13.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XPP | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 | 1.29 | -1.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.09 | 0.64 | -0.73 |
Correlation
The correlation between XPP and QTAP is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
XPP vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison
XPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, while QTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XPP ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 | 2.59% | 2.32% | 2.96% | 2.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.81% | 1.47% |
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
XPP vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XPP drawdown since its inception was -89.90%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPP and QTAP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XPP | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.90% | -29.44% | -60.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.09% | -12.04% | -20.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -85.54% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.80% | 0.00% | -77.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.52% | -5.21% | -42.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.74% | 1.68% | +11.06% |
Volatility
XPP vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP) has a higher volatility of 13.51% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) at 1.88%. This indicates that XPP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XPP | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.51% | 1.88% | +11.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.10% | 3.23% | +25.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.46% | 16.38% | +31.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.66% | 19.03% | +43.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.97% | 19.03% | +35.94% |