XPP vs. JCHI

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XPP (ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50) and JCHI (JPMorgan Active China ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XPP is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the FTSE/Xinhua China 25 Index (200%), while JCHI is a China Equities fund actively managed by JPMorgan. XPP is passively managed, while JCHI is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, XPP returned 7.29%/yr vs 8.99%/yr for JCHI. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XPP charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for JCHI.

Performance

XPP vs. JCHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP) and JPMorgan Active China ETF (JCHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XPP achieves a -17.88% return, which is significantly lower than JCHI's 0.50% return.

XPP

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: -6.29%
• YTD: -17.88%
• 6M: -20.50%
• 1Y: -9.29%
• 3Y*: 7.29%
• 5Y*: -20.16%
• 10Y*: -5.58%

JCHI

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: -0.31%
• YTD: 0.50%
• 6M: -0.36%
• 1Y: 16.23%
• 3Y*: 8.99%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XPP vs. JCHI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
XPP ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50	-17.88%	45.84%	38.18%	-29.27%
JCHI JPMorgan Active China ETF	0.50%	27.66%	13.77%	-17.06%

Correlation

The correlation between XPP and JCHI is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2023	0.94

The correlation between XPP and JCHI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

XPP vs. JCHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XPP	JCHI
Financial Services	42.1%	20.6%
Basic Materials	-	6.7%
Communication Services	-	14.5%
Consumer Cyclical	-	20.6%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.1%
Energy	-	3.3%
Healthcare	-	4.7%
Industrials	-	10.7%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	14.7%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XPP vs. JCHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XPP

XPP Risk / Return Rank: 7
XPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
XPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
XPP Omega Ratio Rank: 7
XPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
XPP Martin Ratio Rank: 6

JCHI

JCHI Risk / Return Rank: 25
JCHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
JCHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
JCHI Omega Ratio Rank: 26
JCHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
JCHI Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XPP vs. JCHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP) and JPMorgan Active China ETF (JCHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XPP	JCHI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.24	0.93	-1.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.08	1.40	-1.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.17	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.29	1.13	-1.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.58	2.74	-3.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XPP vs. JCHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XPP Sharpe Ratio is -0.24, which is lower than the JCHI Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XPP and JCHI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XPP	JCHI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.24	0.93	-1.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.32	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.10	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.10	0.25	-0.34

Drawdowns

XPP vs. JCHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XPP drawdown since its inception was -89.90%, which is greater than JCHI's maximum drawdown of -29.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPP and JCHI.

Drawdown Indicators

	XPP	JCHI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.90%	-29.57%	-60.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.60%	-14.37%	-18.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-52.95%	-27.47%	-25.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-85.24%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-89.90%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-78.27%	-7.41%	-70.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-47.83%	-13.33%	-34.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.07%	5.93%	+10.14%

Volatility

XPP vs. JCHI - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP) has a higher volatility of 14.45% compared to JPMorgan Active China ETF (JCHI) at 6.28%. This indicates that XPP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JCHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XPP	JCHI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.45%	6.28%	+8.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.79%	12.32%	+16.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.21%	17.59%	+21.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	62.75%	24.86%	+37.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	54.90%	24.86%	+30.04%

XPP vs. JCHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

XPP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than JCHI's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

XPP vs. JCHI - Dividend Comparison

XPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, more than JCHI's 1.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
JCHI JPMorgan Active China ETF	1.80%	1.81%	2.12%	2.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XPP ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50	2.64%	2.32%	2.96%	2.87%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.81%	1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XPP and JCHI in my portfolio?

XPP and JCHI have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XPP or JCHI?

XPP has higher volatility (14.45%) compared to JCHI (6.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XPP dropped -89.90% vs JCHI's -29.57%.

Which ETF is better, XPP or JCHI?

On 3-year performance, JCHI leads with 8.99% vs 7.29% for XPP. On fees, JCHI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, JCHI has been the lower-risk option at 6.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XPP or JCHI?

Over the 3-year period, JCHI has performed better with a 8.99% return vs 7.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XPP or JCHI?

JCHI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for XPP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XPP or JCHI?

XPP has the higher dividend yield at 2.64%, compared with 1.80% for JCHI.

What is the main difference between XPP and JCHI?

XPP is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while JCHI is China Equities. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for XPP and 0.65% for JCHI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JCHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.