XPND vs. STHH

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

XPND (First Trust Expanded Technology ETF) and STHH (STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged) are both Technology Equities funds. XPND is actively managed, while STHH is passively managed. Over the past year, XPND returned 15.04% vs 114.11% for STHH. Their 0.61 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. XPND charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for STHH.

Performance

XPND vs. STHH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Expanded Technology ETF (XPND) and STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XPND achieves a 6.06% return, which is significantly lower than STHH's 107.29% return.

XPND

• 1D: 1.23%
• 1M: -3.81%
• 6M: 7.94%
• YTD: 6.06%
• 1Y: 15.04%
• 3Y*: 22.06%
• 5Y*: 12.22%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.68%

STHH

• 1D: -0.49%
• 1M: -23.24%
• 6M: 87.74%
• YTD: 107.29%
• 1Y: 114.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 100.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged	$179.41K	$298.65K	$521.22K
XPND First Trust Expanded Technology ETF	$71.00K	$148.72K	$150.95K

XPND vs. STHH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XPND First Trust Expanded Technology ETF	6.06%	35.03%
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged	107.29%	17.60%

Correlation

The correlation between XPND and STHH is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2025	0.61

The correlation between XPND and STHH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XPND vs. STHH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XPND

XPND Risk / Return Rank: 27
XPND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
XPND Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
XPND Omega Ratio Rank: 27
XPND Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
XPND Martin Ratio Rank: 27

STHH

STHH Risk / Return Rank: 79
STHH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
STHH Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
STHH Omega Ratio Rank: 80
STHH Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
STHH Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XPND vs. STHH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Expanded Technology ETF (XPND) and STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XPND	STHH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.70	2.04	-1.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.07	2.52	-1.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.35	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.87	3.02	-2.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.29	9.83	-7.54

XPND vs. STHH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XPND Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the STHH Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XPND and STHH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XPND vs. STHH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XPND drawdown since its inception was -38.00%, roughly equal to the maximum STHH drawdown of -37.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPND and STHH.

Drawdown Indicators

	XPND	STHH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.00%	-37.98%	-0.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.38%	-37.98%	+20.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.37%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.00%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.58%	-33.80%	+24.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.95%	-10.91%	+0.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.59%	11.65%	-5.06%

Volatility

XPND vs. STHH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Expanded Technology ETF (XPND) is 7.43%, while STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH) has a volatility of 26.83%. This indicates that XPND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STHH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XPND	STHH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.43%	26.83%	-19.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.20%	48.53%	-30.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.61%	56.48%	-34.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.43%	55.09%	-30.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.20%	55.09%	-30.89%

XPND vs. STHH - Expense Ratio Comparison

XPND has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than STHH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

XPND vs. STHH - Dividend Comparison

XPND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than STHH's 0.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged	0.97%	0.69%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XPND First Trust Expanded Technology ETF	0.08%	0.08%	0.12%	0.18%	0.34%	0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XPND and STHH in my portfolio?

XPND and STHH have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XPND or STHH?

STHH has higher volatility (26.83%) compared to XPND (7.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XPND dropped -38.00% vs STHH's -37.98%.

Which ETF is better, XPND or STHH?

On 1-year performance, STHH leads with 114.11% vs 15.04% for XPND. On fees, STHH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, XPND has been the lower-risk option at 7.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XPND or STHH?

Over the 1-year period, STHH has performed better with a 114.11% return vs 15.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XPND or STHH?

STHH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for XPND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XPND or STHH?

STHH has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.08% for XPND.

What is the main difference between XPND and STHH?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for XPND and 0.19% for STHH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

STHH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.