PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XPND vs. FNGS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XPND vs. FNGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Expanded Technology ETF (XPND) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XPND vs. FNGS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XPND
First Trust Expanded Technology ETF
-8.31%18.82%29.61%46.13%-29.66%15.05%
FNGS
MicroSectors FANG+ ETN
-10.61%18.64%51.99%95.24%-40.32%9.54%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XPND achieves a -8.31% return, which is significantly higher than FNGS's -10.61% return.


XPND

1D
0.83%
1M
-4.12%
YTD
-8.31%
6M
-9.25%
1Y
16.58%
3Y*
21.77%
5Y*
10Y*

FNGS

1D
2.05%
1M
-3.29%
YTD
-10.61%
6M
-12.74%
1Y
20.77%
3Y*
31.31%
5Y*
16.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XPND vs. FNGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

XPND has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FNGS's 0.58% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XPND vs. FNGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XPND
XPND Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
XPND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XPND Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
XPND Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
XPND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
XPND Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

FNGS
FNGS Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
FNGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNGS Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FNGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNGS Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XPND vs. FNGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Expanded Technology ETF (XPND) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XPNDFNGSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.71

0.77

-0.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.14

1.32

-0.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.17

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

0.96

+0.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.98

2.94

+0.04

XPND vs. FNGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XPND Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is comparable to the FNGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XPND and FNGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XPNDFNGSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

0.77

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.91

-0.44

Correlation

The correlation between XPND and FNGS is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

XPND vs. FNGS - Dividend Comparison

XPND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, while FNGS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021
XPND
First Trust Expanded Technology ETF
0.11%0.08%0.12%0.18%0.34%0.02%
FNGS
MicroSectors FANG+ ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

XPND vs. FNGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XPND drawdown since its inception was -38.00%, smaller than the maximum FNGS drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPND and FNGS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XPNDFNGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.00%

-48.98%

+10.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.38%

-22.93%

+5.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.59%

-17.66%

+4.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.31%

-11.02%

+0.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.83%

7.52%

-1.69%

Volatility

XPND vs. FNGS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Expanded Technology ETF (XPND) is 7.15%, while MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) has a volatility of 8.61%. This indicates that XPND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XPNDFNGSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.15%

8.61%

-1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.52%

15.82%

-1.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.48%

27.04%

-3.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.08%

29.98%

-5.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.08%

31.34%

-7.26%