PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XPND vs. MTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XPND vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Expanded Technology ETF (XPND) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XPND achieves a 16.32% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 31.75% return.


XPND

1D
-0.83%
1M
12.34%
YTD
16.32%
6M
15.44%
1Y
32.11%
3Y*
28.18%
5Y*
10Y*

MTUM

1D
1.06%
1M
15.90%
YTD
31.75%
6M
32.38%
1Y
41.76%
3Y*
34.75%
5Y*
15.21%
10Y*
17.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XPND vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XPND
First Trust Expanded Technology ETF
16.32%18.82%29.61%46.13%-29.66%15.05%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
31.75%22.15%32.89%9.15%-18.27%7.86%

Correlation

The correlation between XPND and MTUM is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2021

0.83

The correlation between XPND and MTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

XPND vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XPND
MTUM

Technology

76.5%
44.4%

Communication Services

15.7%
7.4%

Financial Services

5.9%
10.4%

Basic Materials

-

1.7%

Consumer Cyclical

-

3.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

3.3%

Energy

-

3.5%

Healthcare

-

6.9%

Industrials

-

15.6%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Utilities

-

1.6%

Technology

XPND
76.5%
MTUM
44.4%

Communication Services

XPND
15.7%
MTUM
7.4%

Financial Services

XPND
5.9%
MTUM
10.4%

Basic Materials

XPND

-

MTUM
1.7%

Consumer Cyclical

XPND

-

MTUM
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

XPND

-

MTUM
3.3%

Energy

XPND

-

MTUM
3.5%

Healthcare

XPND

-

MTUM
6.9%

Industrials

XPND

-

MTUM
15.6%

Real Estate

XPND

-

MTUM
1.8%

Utilities

XPND

-

MTUM
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XPND vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XPND
XPND Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
XPND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XPND Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
XPND Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
XPND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
XPND Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

MTUM
MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XPND vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Expanded Technology ETF (XPND) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XPNDMTUMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.81

2.20

-0.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.42

2.98

-0.56

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.39

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

3.64

-1.78

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.46

14.50

-9.04

XPND vs. MTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XPND Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the MTUM Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XPND and MTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XPNDMTUMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

2.20

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.85

-0.16

Drawdowns

XPND vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XPND drawdown since its inception was -38.00%, which is greater than MTUM's maximum drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPND and MTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XPNDMTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.00%

-34.08%

-3.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.38%

-11.54%

-5.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.37%

-20.99%

-2.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

0.00%

-0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.07%

-6.21%

-3.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.90%

2.89%

+3.01%

Volatility

XPND vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Expanded Technology ETF (XPND) is 4.57%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 7.68%. This indicates that XPND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XPNDMTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.57%

7.68%

-3.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.02%

16.46%

-2.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.86%

19.04%

-1.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.88%

20.60%

+3.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.88%

21.03%

+2.85%

XPND vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

XPND has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

XPND vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison

XPND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than MTUM's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
0.60%0.91%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%
XPND
First Trust Expanded Technology ETF
0.09%0.08%0.12%0.18%0.34%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XPND and MTUM have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTUM has higher volatility (7.68%) compared to XPND (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XPND dropped -38.00% vs MTUM's -34.08%.

On 3-year performance, MTUM leads with 34.75% vs 28.18% for XPND. On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, XPND has been the lower-risk option at 4.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 34.75% return vs 28.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for XPND.

MTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.09% for XPND.

XPND is categorized as Technology Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for XPND and 0.15% for MTUM.

MTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XPND and MTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer