XPND vs. MTUM
XPND (First Trust Expanded Technology ETF) and MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XPND is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by First Trust, while MTUM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. XPND is actively managed, while MTUM is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XPND returned 28.18%/yr vs 34.75%/yr for MTUM. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XPND charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MTUM.
Performance
XPND vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XPND achieves a 16.32% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 31.75% return.
XPND
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 12.34%
- YTD
- 16.32%
- 6M
- 15.44%
- 1Y
- 32.11%
- 3Y*
- 28.18%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MTUM
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- 15.90%
- YTD
- 31.75%
- 6M
- 32.38%
- 1Y
- 41.76%
- 3Y*
- 34.75%
- 5Y*
- 15.21%
- 10Y*
- 17.31%
XPND vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XPND First Trust Expanded Technology ETF | 16.32% | 18.82% | 29.61% | 46.13% | -29.66% | 15.05% |
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 31.75% | 22.15% | 32.89% | 9.15% | -18.27% | 7.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between XPND and MTUM is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2021 | 0.83 |
The correlation between XPND and MTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
XPND vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XPND
MTUM
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
XPND
MTUM
Communication Services
XPND
MTUM
Financial Services
XPND
MTUM
Basic Materials
XPND
-
MTUM
Consumer Cyclical
XPND
-
MTUM
Consumer Defensive
XPND
-
MTUM
Energy
XPND
-
MTUM
Healthcare
XPND
-
MTUM
Industrials
XPND
-
MTUM
Real Estate
XPND
-
MTUM
Utilities
XPND
-
MTUM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XPND vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank
XPND
MTUM
XPND vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Expanded Technology ETF (XPND) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XPND | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.81 | 2.20 | -0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.42 | 2.98 | -0.56 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.39 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | 3.64 | -1.78 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.46 | 14.50 | -9.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XPND | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.81 | 2.20 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.85 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
XPND vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XPND drawdown since its inception was -38.00%, which is greater than MTUM's maximum drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPND and MTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XPND | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.00% | -34.08% | -3.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.38% | -11.54% | -5.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.37% | -20.99% | -2.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.83% | 0.00% | -0.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.07% | -6.21% | -3.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.90% | 2.89% | +3.01% |
Volatility
XPND vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Expanded Technology ETF (XPND) is 4.57%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 7.68%. This indicates that XPND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XPND | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.57% | 7.68% | -3.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.02% | 16.46% | -2.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.86% | 19.04% | -1.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.88% | 20.60% | +3.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.88% | 21.03% | +2.85% |
XPND vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
XPND has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
XPND vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison
XPND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than MTUM's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 0.60% | 0.91% | 0.75% | 1.35% | 1.80% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 1.43% | 1.12% |
XPND First Trust Expanded Technology ETF | 0.09% | 0.08% | 0.12% | 0.18% | 0.34% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XPND and MTUM have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MTUM has higher volatility (7.68%) compared to XPND (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XPND dropped -38.00% vs MTUM's -34.08%.
On 3-year performance, MTUM leads with 34.75% vs 28.18% for XPND. On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, XPND has been the lower-risk option at 4.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 34.75% return vs 28.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for XPND.
MTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.09% for XPND.
XPND is categorized as Technology Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for XPND and 0.15% for MTUM.
MTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XPND and MTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer