PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XPND vs. GFOF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XPND vs. GFOF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Expanded Technology ETF (XPND) and Grayscale Future of Finance ETF (GFOF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XPND

1D
-0.83%
1M
12.34%
YTD
16.32%
6M
15.44%
1Y
32.11%
3Y*
28.18%
5Y*
10Y*

GFOF

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XPND vs. GFOF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XPND
First Trust Expanded Technology ETF
16.32%18.82%29.61%46.13%-23.72%
GFOF
Grayscale Future of Finance ETF
0.00%0.00%60.08%145.49%-68.58%

Correlation

The correlation between XPND and GFOF is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2022

0.50

The correlation between XPND and GFOF shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (3 years) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XPND vs. GFOF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XPND
GFOF

Technology

76.5%
22.8%

Communication Services

15.7%

-

Financial Services

5.9%
57.4%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Industrials

-

3.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

XPND
76.5%
GFOF
22.8%

Communication Services

XPND
15.7%
GFOF

-

Financial Services

XPND
5.9%
GFOF
57.4%

Basic Materials

XPND

-

GFOF

-

Consumer Cyclical

XPND

-

GFOF

-

Consumer Defensive

XPND

-

GFOF

-

Energy

XPND

-

GFOF

-

Healthcare

XPND

-

GFOF
8.5%

Industrials

XPND

-

GFOF
3.4%

Real Estate

XPND

-

GFOF

-

Utilities

XPND

-

GFOF

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XPND vs. GFOF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XPND
XPND Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
XPND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XPND Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
XPND Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
XPND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
XPND Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

GFOF
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XPND vs. GFOF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Expanded Technology ETF (XPND) and Grayscale Future of Finance ETF (GFOF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XPNDGFOFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.46

XPND vs. GFOF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XPNDGFOFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

Drawdowns

XPND vs. GFOF - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XPNDGFOFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.90%

Volatility

XPND vs. GFOF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XPNDGFOFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.88%

XPND vs. GFOF - Expense Ratio Comparison

XPND has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than GFOF's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

XPND vs. GFOF - Dividend Comparison

XPND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, while GFOF has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
GFOF
Grayscale Future of Finance ETF
0.00%0.00%2.55%4.08%0.00%0.00%
XPND
First Trust Expanded Technology ETF
0.09%0.08%0.12%0.18%0.34%0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


XPND and GFOF have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XPND is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XPND is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GFOF.

XPND has the higher dividend yield at 0.09%, compared with 0.00% for GFOF.

XPND is categorized as Technology Equities, while GFOF is Blockchain. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for XPND and 0.70% for GFOF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XPND and GFOF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer