XPH vs. SPYG
XPH (SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XPH is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the S&P Pharmaceuticals Select Industry Index, while SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XPH returned 3.44%/yr vs 18.20%/yr for SPYG. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XPH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYG.
Performance
XPH vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XPH achieves a 0.66% return, which is significantly lower than SPYG's 13.75% return. Over the past 10 years, XPH has underperformed SPYG with an annualized return of 3.44%, while SPYG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.20% annualized return.
XPH
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- -4.74%
- YTD
- 0.66%
- 6M
- 4.44%
- 1Y
- 37.98%
- 3Y*
- 13.07%
- 5Y*
- 3.50%
- 10Y*
- 3.44%
SPYG
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 7.38%
- YTD
- 13.75%
- 6M
- 13.57%
- 1Y
- 33.95%
- 3Y*
- 28.16%
- 5Y*
- 16.07%
- 10Y*
- 18.20%
XPH vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XPH SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF | 0.66% | 31.60% | 4.94% | 2.97% | -9.83% | -10.54% | 14.68% | 25.61% | -15.32% | 12.05% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 13.75% | 22.09% | 35.99% | 30.02% | -29.41% | 32.01% | 33.46% | 30.84% | -0.12% | 27.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between XPH and SPYG is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2006 | 0.62 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XPH and SPYG has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XPH vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XPH
SPYG
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
XPH
SPYG
Basic Materials
XPH
-
SPYG
Communication Services
XPH
-
SPYG
Consumer Cyclical
XPH
-
SPYG
Consumer Defensive
XPH
-
SPYG
Energy
XPH
-
SPYG
Financial Services
XPH
-
SPYG
Industrials
XPH
-
SPYG
Real Estate
XPH
-
SPYG
Technology
XPH
-
SPYG
Utilities
XPH
-
SPYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XPH vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank
XPH
SPYG
XPH vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF (XPH) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XPH | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.37 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.19 | 2.48 | +0.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.37 | 10.25 | +1.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XPH | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.77 | 2.12 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.76 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 | 0.88 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.35 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
XPH vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XPH drawdown since its inception was -48.03%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPH and SPYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XPH | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.03% | -67.63% | +19.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.97% | -13.76% | +1.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.57% | -22.14% | -1.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.63% | -32.67% | +1.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.97% | -32.67% | -3.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.22% | -1.13% | -6.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.25% | -24.33% | +7.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | 3.32% | +0.03% |
Volatility
XPH vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF (XPH) has a higher volatility of 7.03% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) at 4.35%. This indicates that XPH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XPH | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.03% | 4.35% | +2.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.77% | 12.46% | +4.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.52% | 16.06% | +5.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.84% | 21.17% | -0.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.10% | 20.64% | +1.46% |
XPH vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
XPH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
XPH vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison
XPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, more than SPYG's 0.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.47% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
XPH SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF | 0.66% | 0.83% | 1.58% | 1.28% | 1.64% | 0.95% | 0.47% | 0.64% | 0.65% | 0.67% | 0.63% | 7.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XPH and SPYG have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XPH has higher volatility (7.03%) compared to SPYG (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XPH dropped -48.03% vs SPYG's -67.63%.
On 10-year performance, SPYG leads with 18.20% vs 3.44% for XPH. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYG has been the lower-risk option at 4.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 18.20% return vs 3.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XPH.
XPH has the higher dividend yield at 0.66%, compared with 0.47% for SPYG.
XPH is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. XPH tracks S&P Pharmaceuticals Select Industry Index, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XPH and 0.04% for SPYG.
SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XPH and SPYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer