PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XPH vs. ALC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XPH vs. ALC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF (XPH) and Alcon Inc. (ALC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XPH achieves a 22.45% return, which is significantly higher than ALC's -13.01% return.


XPH

1D
-2.30%
1M
13.67%
6M
23.00%
YTD
22.45%
1Y
63.68%
3Y*
20.03%
5Y*
6.98%
10Y*
5.48%

ALC

1D
1.00%
1M
1.44%
6M
-14.45%
YTD
-13.01%
1Y
-21.63%
3Y*
-6.14%
5Y*
-0.20%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XPH vs. ALC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XPH
SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF
22.45%31.60%4.94%2.97%-9.83%-10.54%14.68%8.67%
ALC
Alcon Inc.
-13.01%-6.50%9.02%14.32%-21.09%32.23%16.63%-2.38%

Correlation

The correlation between XPH and ALC is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2019

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XPH vs. ALC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XPH
XPH Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
XPH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XPH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
XPH Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
XPH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
XPH Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

ALC
ALC Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
ALC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALC Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
ALC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALC Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XPH vs. ALC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF (XPH) and Alcon Inc. (ALC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XPHALCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

0.88

+0.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.19

-0.71

+5.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.62

-1.29

+19.91

XPH vs. ALC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XPH Sharpe Ratio is 2.78, which is higher than the ALC Sharpe Ratio of -0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XPH and ALC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XPH vs. ALC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XPH drawdown since its inception was -48.03%, which is greater than ALC's maximum drawdown of -37.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPH and ALC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XPHALCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.03%

-37.33%

-10.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.97%

-32.01%

+20.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.57%

-37.33%

+13.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.63%

-37.33%

+5.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.30%

-31.48%

+29.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.17%

-11.97%

-5.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.33%

17.63%

-14.30%

Volatility

XPH vs. ALC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF (XPH) is 6.53%, while Alcon Inc. (ALC) has a volatility of 7.61%. This indicates that XPH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XPHALCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.53%

7.61%

-1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.21%

21.72%

-4.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.34%

29.04%

-6.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.07%

27.16%

-6.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.09%

27.87%

-5.78%

Dividends

XPH vs. ALC - Dividend Comparison

XPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than ALC's 1.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALC
Alcon Inc.
1.19%0.84%0.31%0.30%0.30%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XPH
SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF
0.49%0.83%1.58%1.28%1.64%0.95%0.47%0.64%0.65%0.67%0.63%7.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


XPH and ALC have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALC has higher volatility (7.61%) compared to XPH (6.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XPH dropped -48.03% vs ALC's -37.33%.

XPH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XPH and ALC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer