PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XPH vs. ALC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XPH vs. ALC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF (XPH) and Alcon Inc. (ALC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XPH achieves a 21.77% return, which is significantly higher than ALC's -11.56% return.


XPH

1D
-2.41%
1M
1.34%
6M
23.05%
YTD
21.77%
1Y
64.21%
3Y*
17.71%
5Y*
7.57%
10Y*
4.97%
ALL TIME*
9.38%

ALC

1D
-0.96%
1M
-1.03%
6M
-13.93%
YTD
-11.56%
1Y
-20.68%
3Y*
-5.58%
5Y*
-0.54%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$158.18M$157.97M$154.82M
$6.19M$7.25M$5.32M

XPH vs. ALC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XPH
SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF
21.77%31.60%4.94%2.97%-9.83%-10.54%14.68%8.67%
ALC
Alcon Inc.
-11.56%-6.50%9.02%14.32%-21.09%32.23%16.63%-2.38%

Correlation

The correlation between XPH and ALC is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2019

0.46

The correlation between XPH and ALC shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.48 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XPH vs. ALC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XPH
XPH Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
XPH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XPH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
XPH Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
XPH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
XPH Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

ALC
ALC Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
ALC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALC Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
ALC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALC Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XPH vs. ALC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF (XPH) and Alcon Inc. (ALC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XPHALCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

0.89

+0.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.57

-0.67

+6.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.83

-1.21

+21.04

XPH vs. ALC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XPH Sharpe Ratio is 2.95, which is higher than the ALC Sharpe Ratio of -0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XPH and ALC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XPH vs. ALC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XPH drawdown since its inception was -48.03%, which is greater than ALC's maximum drawdown of -37.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPH and ALC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XPHALCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.03%

-37.33%

-10.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.97%

-30.42%

+18.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.57%

-37.33%

+13.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.92%

-37.33%

+6.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.84%

-30.34%

+27.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.13%

-12.12%

-5.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.35%

16.88%

-13.53%

Volatility

XPH vs. ALC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF (XPH) is 8.09%, while Alcon Inc. (ALC) has a volatility of 9.26%. This indicates that XPH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XPHALCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.09%

9.26%

-1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.55%

22.45%

-4.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.68%

29.27%

-6.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.02%

27.29%

-6.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.13%

27.89%

-5.76%

Dividends

XPH vs. ALC - Dividend Comparison

XPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than ALC's 1.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALC
Alcon Inc.
1.17%0.84%0.31%0.30%0.30%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XPH
SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF
0.49%0.83%1.58%1.28%1.64%0.95%0.47%0.64%0.65%0.67%0.63%7.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


XPH and ALC have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALC has higher volatility (9.26%) compared to XPH (8.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XPH dropped -48.03% vs ALC's -37.33%.

XPH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XPH and ALC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer