XOVR vs. XLE
XOVR (ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF) and XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XOVR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the ER30TR Index, while XLE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XOVR returned 5.40%/yr vs 20.12%/yr for XLE. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XOVR charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLE.
Performance
XOVR vs. XLE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XOVR achieves a -0.89% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 29.56% return.
XOVR
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.78%
- YTD
- -0.89%
- 6M
- 0.05%
- 1Y
- 8.89%
- 3Y*
- 17.94%
- 5Y*
- 5.40%
- 10Y*
- —
XLE
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- YTD
- 29.56%
- 6M
- 28.37%
- 1Y
- 37.19%
- 3Y*
- 16.18%
- 5Y*
- 20.12%
- 10Y*
- 9.91%
XOVR vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XOVR ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF | -0.89% | 11.83% | 33.21% | 51.89% | -41.09% | -7.24% | 50.39% | 31.72% | -5.02% | 1.54% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 29.56% | 7.88% | 5.56% | -0.63% | 64.32% | 53.28% | -32.67% | 11.74% | -18.22% | 3.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between XOVR and XLE is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2017 | 0.26 |
The correlation between XOVR and XLE shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XOVR vs. XLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XOVR
XLE
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Energy
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
XOVR
XLE
-
Communication Services
XOVR
XLE
-
Healthcare
XOVR
XLE
-
Financial Services
XOVR
XLE
-
Consumer Cyclical
XOVR
XLE
-
Industrials
XOVR
XLE
-
Energy
XOVR
XLE
Basic Materials
XOVR
-
XLE
-
Consumer Defensive
XOVR
-
XLE
-
Real Estate
XOVR
-
XLE
-
Utilities
XOVR
-
XLE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XOVR vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank
XOVR
XLE
XOVR vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XOVR | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.30 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.37 | 3.10 | -2.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.81 | 8.63 | -7.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XOVR vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XOVR drawdown since its inception was -56.28%, smaller than the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOVR and XLE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XOVR | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.28% | -71.26% | +14.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.32% | -12.05% | -12.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.23% | -20.14% | -5.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.35% | -26.04% | -23.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.06% | -8.01% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.37% | -17.97% | -0.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.02% | 4.32% | +6.70% |
Volatility
XOVR vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison
ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) has a higher volatility of 8.27% compared to State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) at 7.26%. This indicates that XOVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XOVR | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.27% | 7.26% | +1.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.23% | 16.79% | -0.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.11% | 20.57% | +0.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.31% | 26.05% | +0.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.93% | 29.58% | -2.65% |
XOVR vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XOVR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
XOVR vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison
XOVR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.59% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
XOVR ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 57.75% | 6.31% | 0.08% | 3.71% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XOVR and XLE have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XOVR has higher volatility (8.27%) compared to XLE (7.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOVR dropped -56.28% vs XLE's -71.26%.
On 5-year performance, XLE leads with 20.12% vs 5.40% for XOVR. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLE has been the lower-risk option at 7.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XLE has performed better with a 20.12% return vs 5.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for XOVR.
XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 0.00% for XOVR.
XOVR is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while XLE is Energy Equities. XOVR tracks ER30TR Index, while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: EntrepreneurShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XOVR and 0.08% for XLE.
XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XOVR and XLE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer