XOVR vs. SPYM
XOVR (ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF) and SPYM (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XOVR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by ERShares, while SPYM is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. XOVR is actively managed, while SPYM is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XOVR returned 3.37%/yr vs 13.13%/yr for SPYM. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. XOVR charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for SPYM.
Performance
XOVR vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XOVR achieves a -4.47% return, which is significantly lower than SPYM's 11.77% return.
XOVR
- 1D
- 3.44%
- 1M
- -8.38%
- 6M
- 4.57%
- YTD
- -4.47%
- 1Y
- -0.88%
- 3Y*
- 16.81%
- 5Y*
- 3.37%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.77%
SPYM
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- 1.73%
- 6M
- 9.55%
- YTD
- 11.77%
- 1Y
- 23.31%
- 3Y*
- 20.83%
- 5Y*
- 13.13%
- 10Y*
- 15.21%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.24%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $833.33M | $955.26M | $1.11B | |
| $32.19M | $37.02M | $109.67M |
XOVR vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XOVR ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF | -4.47% | 11.83% | 33.21% | 51.89% | -41.09% | -7.24% | 50.39% | 31.72% | -5.02% | 1.54% |
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 11.77% | 17.79% | 25.00% | 26.24% | -18.09% | 28.78% | 18.49% | 31.99% | -4.78% | 3.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between XOVR and SPYM is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2017 | 0.79 |
The correlation between XOVR and SPYM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
XOVR vs. SPYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XOVR
SPYM
Technology
Communication Services
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
XOVR
SPYM
Communication Services
XOVR
SPYM
Healthcare
XOVR
SPYM
Financial Services
XOVR
SPYM
Consumer Cyclical
XOVR
SPYM
Industrials
XOVR
SPYM
Energy
XOVR
SPYM
Basic Materials
XOVR
-
SPYM
Consumer Defensive
XOVR
-
SPYM
Real Estate
XOVR
-
SPYM
Utilities
XOVR
-
SPYM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XOVR vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank
XOVR
SPYM
XOVR vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XOVR | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.33 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.04 | 2.63 | -2.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.08 | 11.23 | -11.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XOVR vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XOVR drawdown since its inception was -56.28%, roughly equal to the maximum SPYM drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOVR and SPYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XOVR | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.28% | -54.46% | -1.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.32% | -8.90% | -15.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.23% | -18.72% | -6.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.35% | -24.48% | -24.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.38% | 0.00% | -11.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.21% | -7.11% | -11.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.53% | 2.08% | +9.45% |
Volatility
XOVR vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison
ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) has a higher volatility of 7.84% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) at 3.76%. This indicates that XOVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XOVR | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.84% | 3.76% | +4.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.11% | 10.18% | +8.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.67% | 12.81% | +10.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.68% | 16.94% | +9.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.03% | 18.02% | +9.01% |
XOVR vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
XOVR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
XOVR vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison
XOVR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 1.02% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.79% | 2.23% | 1.75% | 1.97% | 1.98% |
XOVR ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 57.75% | 6.31% | 0.08% | 3.71% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XOVR and SPYM have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XOVR has higher volatility (7.84%) compared to SPYM (3.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOVR dropped -56.28% vs SPYM's -54.46%.
On 5-year performance, SPYM leads with 13.13% vs 3.37% for XOVR. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 3.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPYM has performed better with a 13.13% return vs 3.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for XOVR.
SPYM has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.00% for XOVR.
XOVR is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPYM is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: ERShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XOVR and 0.02% for SPYM.
SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XOVR and SPYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer