PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XOVR vs. QUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XOVR vs. QUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOVR achieves a -0.35% return, which is significantly lower than QUS's 6.67% return.


XOVR

1D
-1.67%
1M
6.93%
YTD
-0.35%
6M
0.55%
1Y
10.88%
3Y*
19.21%
5Y*
6.16%
10Y*

QUS

1D
-0.43%
1M
2.68%
YTD
6.67%
6M
6.93%
1Y
17.65%
3Y*
17.53%
5Y*
11.08%
10Y*
13.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOVR vs. QUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XOVR
ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF
-0.35%11.83%33.21%51.89%-41.09%-7.24%50.39%31.72%-5.02%1.68%
QUS
SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
6.67%14.13%18.99%21.78%-14.15%26.72%12.40%32.45%-3.66%4.05%

Correlation

The correlation between XOVR and QUS is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2017

0.71

The correlation between XOVR and QUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.75 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XOVR vs. QUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XOVR
QUS

Technology

34.1%
26.3%

Communication Services

26.7%
10.2%

Healthcare

18.4%
13.4%

Financial Services

8.5%
14.6%

Consumer Cyclical

6.9%
5.8%

Industrials

5.4%
8.6%

Energy

3.1%
4.6%

Basic Materials

-

2.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

9.2%

Real Estate

-

1.4%

Utilities

-

3.6%

Technology

XOVR
34.1%
QUS
26.3%

Communication Services

XOVR
26.7%
QUS
10.2%

Healthcare

XOVR
18.4%
QUS
13.4%

Financial Services

XOVR
8.5%
QUS
14.6%

Consumer Cyclical

XOVR
6.9%
QUS
5.8%

Industrials

XOVR
5.4%
QUS
8.6%

Energy

XOVR
3.1%
QUS
4.6%

Basic Materials

XOVR

-

QUS
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

XOVR

-

QUS
9.2%

Real Estate

XOVR

-

QUS
1.4%

Utilities

XOVR

-

QUS
3.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XOVR vs. QUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOVR
XOVR Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
XOVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOVR Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
XOVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOVR Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

QUS
QUS Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
QUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUS Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
QUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOVR vs. QUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XOVRQUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.35

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.45

2.59

-2.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.00

11.54

-10.54

XOVR vs. QUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOVR Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the QUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOVR and QUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XOVRQUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

1.95

-1.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

0.78

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.77

-0.38

Drawdowns

XOVR vs. QUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOVR drawdown since its inception was -56.28%, which is greater than QUS's maximum drawdown of -33.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOVR and QUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XOVRQUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.28%

-33.78%

-22.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.32%

-6.85%

-17.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.23%

-13.94%

-11.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.35%

-22.30%

-27.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.55%

-0.50%

-7.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.41%

-3.70%

-14.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.94%

1.53%

+9.41%

Volatility

XOVR vs. QUS - Volatility Comparison

ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) has a higher volatility of 4.20% compared to SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) at 1.78%. This indicates that XOVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XOVRQUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.20%

1.78%

+2.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.81%

6.66%

+8.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.00%

9.09%

+10.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.15%

14.33%

+11.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.87%

16.42%

+10.45%

XOVR vs. QUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

XOVR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QUS's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

XOVR vs. QUS - Dividend Comparison

XOVR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QUS
SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
1.31%1.38%1.49%1.57%1.68%1.27%1.73%1.81%2.12%1.86%2.07%1.48%
XOVR
ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%57.75%6.31%0.08%3.71%0.08%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XOVR and QUS have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XOVR has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to QUS (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOVR dropped -56.28% vs QUS's -33.78%.

On 5-year performance, QUS leads with 11.08% vs 6.16% for XOVR. On fees, QUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QUS has been the lower-risk option at 1.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QUS has performed better with a 11.08% return vs 6.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for XOVR.

QUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 0.00% for XOVR.

XOVR tracks ER30TR Index, while QUS tracks MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped (USD). They also come from different issuers: EntrepreneurShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XOVR and 0.15% for QUS.

QUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XOVR and QUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer